IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v33y2017i2p303-334n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Components of Mean Squared Error to Evaluate the Benefits of Mixing Data Collection Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts Caroline

    (Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lausanne, Bâtiment Géopolis, Quartier Mouline, CH-1015Lausanne, Switzerland.)

  • Vandenplas Caroline

    (Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45 – Box 3601, BE-3000Leuven, Belgium.)

Abstract

Mixed mode data collection designs are increasingly being adopted with the hope that they may reduce selection errors in single mode survey designs. Yet possible reductions in selection errors achieved by mixing modes may be offset by a potential increase in total survey error due to extra measurement error being introduced by the additional mode(s). Few studies have investigated this empirically, however. In the present study, we compute the Mean Squared Error (MSE) for a range of estimates using data from a mode comparison experiment. We compare two mixed mode designs (a sequential web plus mail survey, and a combined concurrent and sequential CATI plus mail survey) with a single mode mail survey. The availability of auxiliary data on the sampling frame allows us to estimate several components of MSE (sampling variance, non-coverage, nonresponse and measurement bias) for a number of sociodemographic and target variables. Overall, MSEs are lowest for the single mode survey, and highest for the CATI plus mail design, though this pattern is not consistent across all estimates. Mixing modes generally reduces total bias, but the relative contribution to total survey error from different sources varies by design and by variable type.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts Caroline & Vandenplas Caroline, 2017. "Estimating Components of Mean Squared Error to Evaluate the Benefits of Mixing Data Collection Modes," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(2), pages 303-334, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:33:y:2017:i:2:p:303-334:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2017-0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2017-0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siemiatycki, J., 1979. "A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 69(3), pages 238-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin J. Evans & Thomas S. Richardson, 2013. "Marginal log-linear parameters for graphical Markov models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(4), pages 743-768, September.
    2. Walker, Chad & Baxter, Jamie & Ouellette, Danielle, 2015. "Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 358-365.
    3. Brinkmann, Christian & Potthoff, Peter, 1983. "Gesundheitliche Probleme in der Eingangsphase der Arbeitslosigkeit," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 16(4), pages 378-394.
    4. Webster, Cynthia, 1997. "Effects of researcher presence and appeal on response quality in hand-delivered, self-administered surveys," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 105-114, February.
    5. Ringler, Christine, 2021. "Truth and lies: The impact of modality on customer feedback," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 376-387.
    6. Oerlemans, Leon A.G. & Chan, Kai-Ying & Volschenk, Jako, 2016. "Willingness to pay for green electricity: A review of the contingent valuation literature and its sources of error," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 875-885.
    7. Siemiatycki, Jack & Richardson, Lesley, 1980. "Statut socio-économique et utilisation des services de santé à Montréal," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 56(2), pages 194-210, avril-jui.
    8. Celia Patricia Kaplan & Joan F. Hilton & Sora Park-Tanjasiri & Eliseo J. PÉrez-Stable, 2001. "The Effect of Data Collection Mode on Smoking Attitudes and Behavior in Young African American and Women," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(4), pages 454-473, August.
    9. Aithal, Sreeramana & Shenoy, Varun, 2016. "Green Placement – An Innovative Concept & Strategy in Campus Placement Model," MPRA Paper 74349, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Sep 2016.
    10. Suthee Sangiambut & Renee Sieber, 2016. "The V in VGI: Citizens or Civic Data Sources," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 141-154.
    11. Torbjørn Moum, 1998. "Mode of administration and interviewer effects in self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 279-318, November.
    12. Brinkmann, Christian & Potthoff, Peter, 1983. "Gesundheitliche Probleme in der Eingangsphase der Arbeitslosigkeit," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 16(4), pages 378-394.
    13. Alissa Goodman & Matt Brown & Richard J. Silverwood & Joseph W. Sakshaug & Lisa Calderwood & Joel Williams & George B. Ploubidis, 2022. "The impact of using the Web in a mixed‐mode follow‐up of a longitudinal birth cohort study: Evidence from the National Child Development Study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 822-850, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:33:y:2017:i:2:p:303-334:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.