IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v30y2014i3p19n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Opt-Out Consent for Record Linkage

Author

Listed:
  • Das Marcel

    (CentERdata and Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Couper Mick P.

    (Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.)

Abstract

This article reports on a study testing the effects of different ways of administering an opt-out consent for record linkage in a probability-based Internet panel. First, we conducted cognitive interviews to explore reactions to a draft version of the opt-out consent text. Second, we conducted a two-factor experiment to test the effects of content manipulations and mode. The results indicate that the way in which respondents were informed did not have much effect on opting out. Results from a follow-up survey on attitudes regarding privacy, confidentiality, and trust, along with knowledge questions about the process of linking, showed no evidence that presenting the opt-out consent statement makes respondents more concerned about privacy. Knowledge about the aspects of record linkage is generally not high. When looking at long-term effects of sending an opt-out consent statement, we found no evidence that this leads to higher attrition or lower participation rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Das Marcel & Couper Mick P., 2014. "Optimizing Opt-Out Consent for Record Linkage," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(3), pages 479-497, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:3:p:19:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2014-0030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danice K. Eaton & Richard Lowry & Nancy D. Brener & Jo Anne Grunbaum & Laura Kann, 2004. "Passive versus Active Parental Permission in School-Based Survey Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 28(6), pages 564-577, December.
    2. Joseph W. Sakshaug & Mick P. Couper & Mary Beth Ofstedal & David R. Weir, 2012. "Linking Survey and Administrative Records," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 535-569, November.
    3. Carolyn Anderman & Allen Cheadle & Susan Curry & Paula Diehr & Linda Shultz & Edward Wagner, 1995. "Selection Bias Related To Parental Consent in School-Based Survey Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 19(6), pages 663-674, December.
    4. Sala, Emanuela & Knies, Gundi & Burton, Jonathan, 2013. "Propensity to consent to data linkage: experimental evidence from the Innovation Panel on the role of three survey design features," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-05, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    5. Emanuela Sala & Jonathan Burton & Gundi Knies, 2012. "Correlates of Obtaining Informed Consent to Data Linkage," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(3), pages 414-439, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Warnke, Arne Jonas, 2017. "An investigation of record linkage refusal and its implications for empirical research," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-031, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Al Baghal, Tarek & Knies, Gundi & Burton, Jonathan, 2014. "Linking administrative records to surveys: differences in the correlates to consent decisions," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-09, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Fertig, Michael & Görlitz, Katja, 2013. "Missing wages: How to test for biased estimates in wage functions?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 269-271.
    4. Bucks, Brian & Pence, Karen, 2015. "Wealth, pensions, debt, and savings: Considerations for a panel survey," Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, IOS Press, issue 1-4, pages 151-175.
    5. Sala, Emanuela & Knies, Gundi & Burton, Jonathan, 2013. "Propensity to consent to data linkage: experimental evidence from the Innovation Panel on the role of three survey design features," Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-05, Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    6. repec:iab:iabfme:201402(en is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Gessendorfer Jonathan & Beste Jonas & Drechsler Jörg & Sakshaug Joseph W., 2018. "Statistical Matching as a Supplement to Record Linkage: A Valuable Method to Tackle Nonconsent Bias?," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(4), pages 909-933, December.
    8. Steffen Künn, 2015. "The challenges of linking survey and administrative data," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 214-214, December.
    9. Fullard, Joshua & Sen, Sonkurt, 2022. "Tell me who you are and I will give you my consent: a light-touch intervention on consent to data linkage," ISER Working Paper Series 2022-10, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    10. Burton, Jonathan & Sala, Emanuela & Knies, Gundi, 2011. "Consenting to health record linkage: evidence from the British Household Panel Study," ISER Working Paper Series 2011-27, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    11. Sakshaug Joseph W., 2022. "Reducing Nonresponse and Data Linkage Consent Bias in Large-Scale Panel Surveys," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1-2), pages 41-55, December.
    12. Emanuela Sala & Daniele Zaccaria & Antonio Guaita, 2020. "Survey participation to the first Wave of a longitudinal study of older people: the case of the Italian InveCe.Ab study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 99-110, February.
    13. Zeina Mneimneh, 2022. "Evaluation of consent to link Twitter data to survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(S2), pages 364-386, December.
    14. Joseph W. Sakshaug & Mick P. Couper & Mary Beth Ofstedal & David R. Weir, 2012. "Linking Survey and Administrative Records," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 535-569, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:3:p:19:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.