IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v13y2020i1p61-79n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Budget as a Tool Supporting the Development of Civil Society in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Kempa Jarosław

    (Faculty of Economy, University of Gdańsk, Poland.)

  • Kozłowski Artur Roland

    (Law and Security Science Institute, WSB University in Gdańsk, Poland.)

Abstract

Although three decades have passed since the fall of communism in Poland, the observed level of social activity in the country is relatively low. Participatory budget emerged as an idea to increase the involvement of citizens in decision-making processes concerning their immediate surroundings. In addition to their inclusion in the activity of local government, this form of citizen participation is expected to have a positive impact on residents’ involvement in activities for the benefit of the local community. The aim of this article is to indicate the conditions that influenced the implementation of the idea of the first participatory budget in Poland and emphasizing the importance of the civic budget in managing public administration through partial decentralization involving local communities in social dialogue for local investment initiatives, especially in large provincial cities in Poland. The following research question was adopted in the paper: has the introduction of a participatory budget in Poland increased social activity and has it been conducive to the development of civil society. In Poland, the initiative to create a civic budget met good political conditions in the relatively small city of Sopot, which had the resources to implement the project. After successful implementation, this initiative was relatively quickly adopted by other Polish local governments, which then on their own introduced social consultations called the civic budget. Not all poviats introduced the civic budget of their own volition. The government, seeing the possibility of political discounting of this new solution, decided to introduce a mandatory participatory budget in town counties and ordered the allocation of funds from their budgets, no less than 1 % of budget expenditure. The article relies on the case-study method, comparative analysis and trend analysis, qualitative and quantitative methods of description, document analysis and statistical data. The analysis focuses on the town of Sopot and provincial capitals. Local conditions are important for understanding the processes of shaping active civic attitudes in Poland, because cities are the poles of development of civil society and give impetus to innovative changes in the entire socio-economic system. The materials used in the article include reports, documents and legal acts regarding the functioning of the town of Sopot.The study showed that the participatory budget indeed activates the local community around various projects. At the same time, the question of directly translating this activity into an increase in the number of organizations, associations and foundations remains debatable. The introduction of the participatory budget to administrative management practice in local-government units in Poland should be considered in terms of the soft power impact of administration on the shaping and development of civil society, which is still in the development stage in Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Kempa Jarosław & Kozłowski Artur Roland, 2020. "Participatory Budget as a Tool Supporting the Development of Civil Society in Poland," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 61-79, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:61-79:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2020-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2020-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. BOAVENTURA de SOUSA SANTOS, 1998. "Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(4), pages 461-510, December.
    2. Džinić Jasmina & Svidroňová Mária Murray & Markowska-Bzducha Ewa, 2016. "Participatory Budgeting: A Comparative Study of Croatia, Poland and Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 31-56, June.
    3. Anwar Shah, 2007. "Participatory Budgeting," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6640.
    4. Anwar Shah, 2007. "Participatory Budgeting : Contents of CD Rom," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6639.
    5. Kukučková Soňa & Bakoš Eduard, 2019. "Does Participatory Budgeting Bolster Voter Turnout in Elections ? The Case of the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 109-129, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    2. Sheely, Ryan, 2015. "Mobilization, Participatory Planning Institutions, and Elite Capture: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 251-266.
    3. Haris Aziz & Sujit Gujar & Manisha Padala & Mashbat Suzuki & Jeremy Vollen, 2022. "Coordinating Monetary Contributions in Participatory Budgeting," Papers 2206.05966, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    4. World Bank Group, 2014. "Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Citizen Engagement in World Bank Group Operations," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21113.
    5. Olszewski, Robert & Pałka, Piotr & Wendland, Agnieszka & Majdzińska, Karolina, 2021. "Application of cooperative game theory in a spatial context: An example of the application of the community-led local development instrument for the decision support system of biogas plants constructi," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Jeongwan Kim, 2014. "Intergovernmental Distribution of VAT Revenue in Korea: Local Consumption Tax," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 30, pages 109-131.
    7. Leśniewska-Napierała Katarzyna & Napierała Tomasz, 2020. "Participatory budgeting: creator or creation of a better place? Evidence from rural Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 48(48), pages 65-81, June.
    8. Mogues, Tewodaj & Erman, Alvina, 2016. "Institutional arrangements to make public spending responsive to the poor—(where) have they worked?: Review of the evidence on four major intervention types," IFPRI discussion papers 1519, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Gonçalves, Sónia, 2014. "The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 94-110.
    10. Steven Ney & Marco Verweij, 2015. "Messy institutions for wicked problems: How to generate clumsy solutions?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1679-1696, December.
    11. Jean Raoul NKOUDOU BENGONO & Boniface EPO NGAH & Simon Pierre ONANA, 2023. "Effets des transferts intergouvernementaux sur la mobilisation des recettes publiques locales : cas des communes camerounaises," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 58, pages 83-101.
    12. Bahel, Eric & Sprumont, Yves, 2021. "Strategy-proof choice with monotonic additive preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 94-99.
    13. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2023. "Multi-dimensional social choice under frugal information: The Tukey median as Condorcet winner ex ante by," Working Paper Series in Economics 160, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    14. Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe, 2019. "Deliberative Politics through Citizens’ Participatory Democracy: A model for Africa Political Processes," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 11-21.
    15. Emilie Frenkiel & Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal, 2019. "The Redistribution of Representation through Participation: Participatory Budgeting in Chengdu and Delhi," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 112-123.
    16. Mohsin Raza Khan & Muhammad Arsalan Nazir & Sabeen Afzal & Jahanzaib Sohail, 2023. "Health financing and public financial management during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Pakistan as low‐income country," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 847-872, May.
    17. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2022. "Condorcet solutions in frugal models of budget allocation," Working Paper Series in Economics 156, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    18. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    19. ,, 2014. "A ranking method based on handicaps," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), September.
    20. Khalid Hasan Al Jasimee & Francisco Javier Blanco-Encomienda, 2023. "A SEM-NCA approach towards the impact of participative budgeting on budgetary slack and managerial performance: The mediating role of leadership style and leader-member exchange," Papers 2310.09993, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    participatory budget; public administration management; Sopot; civil society; cities; democracy; Poland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H79 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:61-79:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.