IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v11y2018i1p155-182n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?

Author

Listed:
  • Špaček David

    (Associate Professor, Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.)

Abstract

The chapter summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF / ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF / ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Špaček David, 2018. "Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 155-182, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:155-182:n:7
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2018-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2018-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2018-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 1998. "Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space," SIGMA Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khadzhyradieva Svitlana & Slukhai Sergii & Rachynskyi Anatolii, 2020. "Public Administration in Ukraine: Adjusting to European Standards," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 81-108, June.
    2. Rybář Marek & Podmaník Milan, 2020. "The Politics of Appointment of Top Civil Servants: Career Backgrounds and Civil Service Politicization in the Czech Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 75-92, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Staroňová Katarína, 2017. "Civil-Service Reforms and Communist Legacy: The Case of Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 177-199, June.
    2. Cristea, Ana Ionela, 2014. "El Espacio Administrativo Europeo en el contexto de la europeización [The European Administrative Space in the context of europeanization]," MPRA Paper 56309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei & Diana-Camelia Iancu, 2011. "Socio-Statistical Research on the Internalization of European Administrative Space Principles in the Romanian Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Tony Verheijen, 2007. "Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States : The Limits of Innovation?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6752.
    5. Matei, Lucica & Iancu, Diana Camelia, 2009. "On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania," MPRA Paper 18941, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 May 2009.
    6. V. Balogh & K. Cseres, 2013. "Institutional Design in Hungary: A Case Study of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 343-365, September.
    7. Andrei, Tudorel & Profiroiu, Marius & Oancea, Bogdan & TurtureaN, Marius & Matei, Ani, 2010. "Analiza unor aspecte legate de mobilitatea si politizarea functiei publice in administratia publica din Romania," MPRA Paper 25957, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Sep 2010.
    8. Kovač Polonca, 2016. "Openness and Transparency in (Slovene) Administrative Procedures as Fundamental European Principles," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 49-67, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:155-182:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.