IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v44y2022i1p20-30n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the State of the Ecosystem on the Quality of Produced Organic Products in a Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Nifatova Olena

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Lutska Tetiana

    (National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Shcherbak Valeriia

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Ganushchak-Yefimenko Liudmyla

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Krakhmalova Nina

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Goncharenko Iryna

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Shkoda Mariana

    (Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The modern economic paradigm of implementation and consumption of agricultural organic products, based on the theoretical concepts of food security of each country, is a kind of “marker of cultural identity” of modern society. In today’s world, more and more people want to lead a healthy lifestyle and consume organic products. In this regard, the impact of the state of the ecosystem on the production of organic agricultural products in the context of sustainable development is high. The system of assessing the state of the ecosystem by four components: atmosphere, water resources, soil, waste pollution and green plantations is proposed. A model for assessing the impact of the state of the ecosystem on the quality of organic production is proposed based on data from 24 regions of Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Nifatova Olena & Lutska Tetiana & Shcherbak Valeriia & Ganushchak-Yefimenko Liudmyla & Krakhmalova Nina & Goncharenko Iryna & Shkoda Mariana, 2022. "The Impact of the State of the Ecosystem on the Quality of Produced Organic Products in a Sustainable Development," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 44(1), pages 20-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:20-30:n:10
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2022.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.03
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2022.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adhikari, Bhim, 2021. "The Economics of Common Pool Resources: A Review," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 4(01), January.
    2. Chopra, Kanchan, 2021. "Nature and Socio- Economic Systems: A Narrative of Conflict and Adaptation," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 4(01), January.
    3. Chorran, Tenzin & Kuchimanchi, Bhavana Rao & Karmakar, Shreya & Sharma, Himani & Ghosh, Debarupa & Priyadarshini, Pratiti, 2021. "Understanding How Local-level Environment Stewardship Initiatives Increase Livelihood Resilience to Climate Change: Insights from Rajasthan, India," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 4(01), January.
    4. Zaburanna, Lesia V. & Lutska, Tetiana V. & Tkachuk, Vadym A., 2020. "Prospects and Challenges for Development of Small Business Forms in Agriculture of Ukraine," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311219, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    5. Costanza, Robert, 2020. "Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services toward the goals of efficiency, fairness, and sustainability," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    6. Delgado, Luisa E. & Marín, Víctor H., 2020. "Ecosystem services and ecosystem degradation: Environmentalist’s expectation?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tania Pinto & Telmo Machado & Diana Nicolau & Nuno Gaspar Oliveira & Ana Sofia Vaz, 2024. "Accounting for nature contributions to people in corporate sustainability: The case of a waste management company in Portugal," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2619-2628, July.
    2. Kim, Myung Ja & Hall, C. Michael & Kwon, Ohbyung & Sohn, Kwonsang, 2024. "Space tourism: Value-attitude-behavior theory, artificial intelligence, and sustainability," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Douglas Vieira Barboza & Marcelo Jasmim Meiri o & S rgio Ricardo da Silveira Barros & Ricardo Luiz Fernandes Bella, 2023. "Towards the Sustainable Decommissioning of Fixed Platforms by Aligning Ecosystem Services and Wind Generation: A Brazilian Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 235-242, May.
    4. Lu, Yanhua & Yan, Lijuan & Li, Jie & Liang, Yunliang & Yang, Chuanjie & Li, Guang & Wu, Jiangqi & Xu, Hua, 2024. "Spatiotemporal evolution of county level ecological security based on an emergy ecological footprint model: The case of Dingxi, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    5. Ioannis Souliotis & Nikolaos Voulvoulis, 2021. "Natural Capital Accounting Informing Water Management Policies in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Margarita Ignatyeva & Vera Yurak & Alexey Dushin, 2022. "Valuating Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services: Systematic Review of Methods in Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Tolessa Deksissa & Harris Trobman & Kamran Zendehdel & Hossain Azam, 2021. "Integrating Urban Agriculture and Stormwater Management in a Circular Economy to Enhance Ecosystem Services: Connecting the Dots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Maria Cerreta & Simona Panaro & Giuliano Poli, 2021. "A Spatial Decision Support System for Multifunctional Landscape Assessment: A Transformative Resilience Perspective for Vulnerable Inland Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Wei Shi & Fuwei Qiao & Liang Zhou, 2021. "Identification of Ecological Risk Zoning on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau from the Perspective of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Prieur, Jacques, 2020. "Critical warning! Preventing the multidimensional apocalypse on planet Earth," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. Chenxi Li & Zhihong Zong & Haichao Qie & Yingying Fang & Qiao Liu, 2023. "CiteSpace and Bibliometric Analysis of Published Research on Forest Ecosystem Services for the Period 2018–2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Farley, Joshua & Melgar, Rigo E.M. & Hasan Ansari, Danish & Burke, Matthew J. & Danielsen, Julia & Egler, Megan & Makombore, Lizah & Neira, Juliana & Poudel, Shashank & Sellers, Shaun & Smolyar, Nina , 2024. "Rethinking ecosystem services from the anthropocene to the Ecozoic: Nature’s benefits to the biotic community," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Bingyi Wang & Tong Chen & Wangbing Liu, 2023. "Accounting for the Logic and Spatiotemporal Evolution of the Comprehensive Value of Cultivated Land around Big Cities: Empirical Evidence Based on 35 Counties in the Hefei Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Maund, Phoebe R. & Irvine, Katherine N. & Dallimer, Martin & Fish, Robert & Austen, Gail E. & Davies, Zoe G., 2020. "Do ecosystem service frameworks represent people’s values?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    15. Yunfei Zhao & Zhibo Han & Yuanquan Xu, 2022. "Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Guangxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Chunsheng Wu & Guoxia Ma & Weishan Yang & Ying Zhou & Fei Peng & Jinnan Wang & Fang Yu, 2021. "Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Differences in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Heydinger, John & Diggle, Richard & Stuart-Hill, Greg & Dierkes, Katharina & Packer, Craig, 2022. "Differentiated payments for ecosystem services based on estimated prey consumption by lions within communal conservancies in northwest Namibia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Correa, Alicia & Forero, Jorge & Marco Renau, Jorge & Lizarazo, Ivan & Mulligan, Mark & Codato, Daniele, 2023. "Advancing spatial decision-making in a transboundary catchment through multidimensional ecosystem services assessment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Ze Zhou & Bin Quan & Zhiwei Deng, 2023. "Effects of Land Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in Xiangjiang River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ecology; ecosystem; organic product; sustainable development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:20-30:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.