IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v43y2021i1p52-66n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of United Territorial Communities in the Functioning of Agricultural Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Balaniuk

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 57, Shevchenka st. 76010, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

  • Kozak Ihor

    (John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 14, Al. Racławickie st. 20-950, Lublin, Poland)

  • Balaniuk Sergiy

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 57, Shevchenka st. 76010, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

  • Kozak-Balaniuk Iryna

    (John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, 14, Al. Racławickie st. 20-950, Lublin, Poland)

  • Sas Liudmyla

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 57, Shevchenka st. 76010, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

  • Shelenko Diana

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 57, Shevchenka st. 76010, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article reveals the features of the balanced development of the United Territorial Communities (UTCs) in Ukraine which aims to create the preconditions for their stable growth and improvement of the quality of life in the countryside. The assessment of the role and of the level of satisfaction of the community from the operation of agricultural enterprises (AEs) in the united territorial communities is carried out. The results of the study have a theoretical and practical significance, especially in the context of non-endogenous development of rural areas, and may also serve as a tool for identifying the best economic solutions for the development of agricultural enterprises that function in UTCs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Balaniuk & Kozak Ihor & Balaniuk Sergiy & Kozak-Balaniuk Iryna & Sas Liudmyla & Shelenko Diana, 2021. "The Role of United Territorial Communities in the Functioning of Agricultural Enterprises," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 43(1), pages 52-66, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:52-66:n:8
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2021.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2021.05
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2021.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Su, Baoren, 2011. "Rural tourism in China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1438-1441.
    2. Peter Cabus & Wim Vanhaverbeke, 2003. "The economics of rural areas in the proximity of urban networks: evidence from Flanders," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 94(2), pages 230-245, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alieh Abadi & Mehdi Khakzand, 2022. "Extracting the qualitative dimensions of agritourism for the sustainable development of Charqoli village in Iran: the promotion of vernacular entrepreneurship and environment-oriented preservation per," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 12609-12671, November.
    2. Sheresheva, Marina Y. & Polukhina, Anna N. & Oborin, Matvey S., 2020. "Marketing issues of sustainable tourism development in Russian regions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 33-38.
    3. Nanping Feng & Fenfen Wei & Kevin H. Zhang & Dongxiao Gu, 2018. "Innovating Rural Tourism Targeting Poverty Alleviation through a Multi-Industries Integration Network: the Case of Zhuanshui Village, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Lai, Zhaohao & Chen, Meiqiu & Liu, Taoju, 2020. "Changes in and prospects for cultivated land use since the reform and opening up in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Johannes Johannes & Syahmardi Yacob & Johni Paul Karolus Pasaribu, 2022. "Examining the behavioral intentions of tourism destination communities:A critical approach to smart rural tourism information system," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 329-335, March.
    6. Di Zuo & Changrong Li & Mingliang Lin & Pinyu Chen & Xiang Kong, 2022. "Tourism, Residents Agent Practice and Traditional Residential Landscapes at a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case Study of Hongcun Village, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Cidell, Julie, 2010. "Concentration and decentralization: The new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 363-371.
    8. Chiara Castelli & Angela Parenti, 2020. "Commuting in Europe: An Inter-regional Analysis on its Determinants and Spatial Effects," Working Papers 2020.19, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Li Lv & Jing Hu & Xin Xu & Xiaobo Tian, 2021. "The Evolution of Rural Tourism in Wuhan: Complexity and Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Bi, Guohua & Yang, Qingyuan, 2023. "The spatial production of rural settlements as rural homestays in the context of rural revitalization: Evidence from a rural tourism experiment in a Chinese village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Randelli, Filippo & Martellozzo, Federico, 2019. "Is rural tourism-induced built-up growth a threat for the sustainability of rural areas? The case study of Tuscany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 387-398.
    12. Xialei Duan & Lawal Mohammed Marafa & Chung-Shing Chan & Han Xu & Lewis T. O. Cheung, 2020. "Measuring the Gaps in the Projected Image and Perceived Image of Rural Tourism Destinations in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Hesse, Markus, 2004. "Stadtregionen und die Politik der Drehscheibe. Zur Konstitution und Konstruktion von Räumen in der Welt der flows," IRS Working Papers 21, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    14. Wei Liu & Christine A Vogt & Junyan Luo & Guangming He & Kenneth A Frank & Jianguo Liu, 2012. "Drivers and Socioeconomic Impacts of Tourism Participation in Protected Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Christou, P. & Hadjielias, E. & Farmaki, A., 2019. "Reconnaissance of philanthropy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Jiaxing Cui & Ruihao Li & Lingyu Zhang & Ying Jing, 2021. "Spatially Illustrating Leisure Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Picking Orchards in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Keke Sun & Zeyu Xing & Xia Cao & Weijia Li, 2021. "The Regime of Rural Ecotourism Stakeholders in Poverty-Stricken Areas of China: Implications for Rural Revitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Vandermeulen, Valerie & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2006. "Decentralized Rural Development Policies: Does it Make Sense? The Example of Diversification in Flanders," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25718, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Chen Che & Bonhak Koo & Jiatong Wang & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Heesup Han, 2021. "Promoting Rural Tourism in Inner Mongolia: Attributes, Satisfaction, and Behaviors among Sustainable Tourists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Li, Xunhuan & Wang, Yongsheng & Wang, Zhaosheng, 2024. "Quantifying the industrial development modes and their capability of realizing the ecological value in rural China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agricultural enterprises; decentralization; infrastructure; questionnaires; SWOT-analysis; territorial communities; united;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:43:y:2021:i:1:p:52-66:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.