IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mosaro/v19y2016i1p95-116n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Perceiving by Employees and Its Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Baruk Agnieszka Izabela

    (. Łódź University of Technology, Department of Management Systems and Innovation University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Department of Management and Marketing, Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

In the article the problems of work perceiving by employees of scientific organizations in the context of marketing orientation rules were presented. It has the theoretical-empirical character. The following research goals were to be gained: identifying the way of work perceiving by respondents; defining the potential dependences between the way of work perceiving (especially its stress dimension) and chosen aspects of professional life. 4 research hypotheses were to be verified. In the empirical part the results of the field researches were presented. To analyse gathered field data the method of correspondence analysis was used. It allowed to gain the research goals and to verify the hypotheses. All of these hypotheses were confirmed. It means that there are statistically significant dependences between the way of work perceiving (especially as stress factor) and analysed row variables. They are relatively the strongest in the case of respondents’ openness for improvement of their intellectual potential. The gained results show that scientific organizations playing the role of employers must conduct activities leading up to positive work perceiving by employees. In this case employees want to improve their knowledge and skills. They are ready to co-create the positive image of given employer too.

Suggested Citation

  • Baruk Agnieszka Izabela, 2016. "Work Perceiving by Employees and Its Consequences," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 95-116, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:95-116:n:2
    DOI: 10.14611/minib.19.01.2016.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14611/minib.19.01.2016.08
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14611/minib.19.01.2016.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:19:y:2016:i:1:p:95-116:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.