R&D Activities in Oligopoly and Social Welfare
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1515/ijme-2015-0025
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2013.
"Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1347-1393, July.
- Nick Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 3728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5077, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," CEP Discussion Papers dp0675, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2007. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5091, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2013. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 46852, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bloom, Nick & Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 780, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Schankerman, Mark & Van Reenen, John & Bloom, Nicholas, 2005. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," CEPR Discussion Papers 4912, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Nicholas Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry," NBER Working Papers 13060, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nick Bloom & Mark Schankerman & John Van Reenen, 2005. "Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry," STICERD - Economics of Industry Papers 40, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Prokop, Jacek & Karbowski, Adam, 2013. "R&D cooperation and industry cartelization," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-41, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
- De Fraja, Gianni & Silipo, Damiano Bruno, 2002.
"Product market competition, R&D, and welfare,"
Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 381-397, December.
- Gianni De Fraja & Damiano Bruno Silipo, "undated". "Product Market Competition, R & D and Welfare," Discussion Papers 96/6, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Spence, Michael, 1984. "Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 101-121, January.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Karbowski, Adam & Kryśkiewicz, Łukasz & Prokop, Jacek, 2018. "Kartele jako przedmiot polityki gospodarczej [Cartels in Public Policy Perspective]," MPRA Paper 90364, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.
- Adam Karbowski & Jacek Prokop, 2018. "R&D activities of enterprises, product market leadership, and collusion," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(2), pages 735-753.
- Karbowski, Adam & Prokop, Jacek, 2016. "Wybrane zagadnienia współpracy badawczo-rozwojowej przedsiębiorstw w ujęciu ekonomii gałęziowej [Selected problems of interfirm R&D cooperation in the industrial organization literature]," MPRA Paper 72784, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2016.
"Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?,"
Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 295-335, June.
- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0991, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Sergey Lychagin & Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade & John Van Reenen, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," NBER Working Papers 16188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Van Reenen, John & Slade, Margaret & Lychagin, Sergey & Pinkse, Joris, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," CEPR Discussion Papers 7928, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Lychagin, Sergey & Slade, Margaret E. & Pinkse, Joris & Van Reenen, John, 2016. "Spillovers in space: does geography matter?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67029, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Ángel L. López & Xavier Vives, 2019.
"Overlapping Ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 2394-2437.
- Vives, Xavier & López, à ngel Luis, 2016. "Overlapping Ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 11315, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ángel L. López & Xavier Vives, 2016. "Overlapping Ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 5935, CESifo.
- Michael D. König & Xiaodong Liu & Yves Zenou, 2019.
"R&D Networks: Theory, Empirics, and Policy Implications,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(3), pages 476-491, July.
- Zenou, Yves & Koenig, Michael & Liu, Xiaodong, 2014. "R&D Networks: Theory, Empirics and Policy Implications," CEPR Discussion Papers 9872, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Michael D. Koenig & Xiaodong Liu & Yves Zenou, 2014. "R&D Networks: Theory, Empirics and Policy Implications," Discussion Papers 13-027, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
- Michael D. König & Xiaodong Liu & Yves Zenou, 2014. "R&D networks: theory, empirics and policy implications," ECON - Working Papers 142, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
- Oh, Jong-Min, 2017. "Absorptive capacity, technology spillovers, and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 146-164.
- Chen, Feng & Wu, Bin & Lou, Wen-qian & Zhu, Bo-wen, 2024. "Impact of dual-credit policy on diffusion of technology R & D among automakers: Based on an evolutionary game model with technology-spillover in complex network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
- Adrien Hervouet & Michel Trommetter, 2020.
"Public-private R&D partnerships: A solution to increase knowledge sharing in R&D cooperation,"
Working Papers
hal-02906270, HAL.
- Hervouet, A. & Trommetter, M., 2020. "Public-private R&D partnerships: A solution to increase knowledge sharing in R&D cooperation," Working Papers 2020-07, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
- Ufuk Akcigit & William Kerr, 2015. "Growth through Heterogeneous Innovation, Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 15-020, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 25 Mar 2015.
- Karbowski, Adam, 2018. "Patents and Enterprise Innovation in Network Industries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 53-61.
- Marta Aloi & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Frederic Tournemaine, 2018.
"Growth and the geography of knowledge,"
Discussion Papers
2018-04, University of Nottingham, GEP.
- Marta Aloi & Joanna Poyago-Theotoky & Frederic Tournemaine, 2018. "Growth and the Geography of Knowledge," CESifo Working Paper Series 6951, CESifo.
- Ufuk Akcigit & William R. Kerr, 2018.
"Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(4), pages 1374-1443.
- Ufuk Akcigit & William R. Kerr, 2010. "Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations," NBER Working Papers 16443, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Akcigit, Ufuk & Kerr, William, 2016. "Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations," CEPR Discussion Papers 11660, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Akcigit, Ufuk & Kerr, William R., 2013. "Growth through heterogeneous innovations," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 28/2013, Bank of Finland.
- Ufuk Akcigit & William R. Kerr, 2010. "Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations," PIER Working Paper Archive 10-035, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Ufuk Akcigit & William R. Kerr, 2012. "Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations," Working Papers 12-08, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
- Ronald Goettler & Brett Gordon, 2014. "Competition and product innovation in dynamic oligopoly," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-42, March.
- Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021.
"The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments,"
International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
- Massimo Motta & Emanuele Tarantino, 2017. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," Economics Working Papers 1579, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Massimo Motta & Emanuele Tarantino, 2017. "The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, when Firms Compete in Prices and Investments," Working Papers 987, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2017. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," Working Papers 17-01, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.
- Massimo Motta & Emanuele Tarantino, 2018. "The Effect of Horizontal Mergers, When Firms compete in Prices and Investments," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2018_056, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Brian Lucking & Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen, 2018.
"Have R&D Spillovers Changed?,"
NBER Working Papers
24622, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bloom, Nick & Lucking, Brian & Van Reenen, John, 2018. "Have R&D spillovers changed?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88699, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Nick Bloom & Brian Lucking & John Van Reenen, 2018. "Have R&D spillovers changed?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1548, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- López, Ángel L. & Vives, Xavier, 2016. "Cross-ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy," IESE Research Papers D/1140, IESE Business School.
- Aldieri, Luigi & Aprile, Maria Carmela & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2015. "R&D Spillovers Effects on strategic behaviour of Large International Firms," MPRA Paper 63402, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Stéphane Lhuillery, 2009. "In search of lost disincentive effect from intra-industry spillovers," CEMI Working Papers cemi-workingpaper-2009-00, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Collège du Management de la Technologie, Management of Technology and Entrepreneurship Institute, Chaire en Economie et Management de l'Innovation.
- Lee, Kyounghun & Oh, Frederick Dongchuhl & Shin, Donglim & Yoon, Heejin, 2024. "Innovation spillovers within business groups: Evidence from Korean chaebols," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
- Spyros Arvanitis & Florian Seliger & Martin Woerter, 2020. "Knowledge Spillovers, Competition and Innovation Success," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(5), pages 1017-1041, October.
- Stéphane Lhuillery, 2011. "Absorptive capacity, efficiency effect and competitors’ spillovers," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-663, October.
- António Osório & Alberto Pinto, 2020. "Income inequality and technological progress: The effect of R&D incentives, integration, and spillovers," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(6), pages 1943-1964, December.
More about this item
Keywords
R&D cooperation of firms; industry cartelization; social welfare; Cournotoligopoly;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
- L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
- O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijomae:v:46:y:2015:i:1:p:134-146:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sgh.waw.pl/kgs/en .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.