IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gosmin/v32y2016i1p25-40n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hard coal project valuation based on real options approach: multiplicative vs. arithmetic stochastic process

Author

Listed:
  • Saługa Piotr W.

    (Professor, AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Energy Management, Faculty of Management, Krakow, Poland)

  • Kamiński Jacek

    (Professor, Mineral & Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Policy and Strategic Research, Division of Energy Economics, Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Precise valuation of the economic efficiency of risky investment projects in the mineral sector has a direct impact on the range of future investments. Since the mid-90s, a number of enterprises have also been giving increased attention to the valuation of managerial flexibility that cannot normally be estimated with classical discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis. This has been the result of a development in the real options analysis (ROA) and the simplification of its algorithms, most of which have been achieved through: ♦ incorporating lattice models,♦ introducing a single uncertain project parameter (gross present value, PV) as an underlying instrument,♦ assuming that the underlying asset follows the multiplicative stochastic process,♦ introducing the ‘marketed asset disclaimer’ (MAD) assumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Saługa Piotr W. & Kamiński Jacek, 2016. "Hard coal project valuation based on real options approach: multiplicative vs. arithmetic stochastic process," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 25-40, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:25-40:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/gospo-2016-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/gospo-2016-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/gospo-2016-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Knopf, Peter M. & Teall, John L., 2015. "Risk Neutral Pricing and Financial Mathematics," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780128015346.
    2. Guj, Pietro, 2011. "A practical real option methodology for the evaluation of farm-in/out joint venture agreements in mineral exploration," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 80-90, March.
    3. M. F. M. Osborne, 1962. "Periodic Structure in the Brownian Motion of Stock Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 345-379, June.
    4. Dehghani, Hesam & Ataee-pour, Majid & Esfahanipour, Akbar, 2014. "Evaluation of the mining projects under economic uncertainties using multidimensional binomial tree," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 124-133.
    5. Geoffrey Poitras, 1998. "Spread options, exchange options, and arithmetic Brownian motion," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(5), pages 487-517, August.
    6. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Otto Konstandatos & Timothy J Kyng, 2012. "Real Options Analysis for Commodity Based Mining Enterprises with Compound and Barrier Features," Published Paper Series 2012-3, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    2. Kamel, Ahmed & Elwageeh, Mohamed & Bonduà, Stefano & Elkarmoty, Mohamed, 2023. "Evaluation of mining projects subjected to economic uncertainties using the Monte Carlo simulation and the binomial tree method: Case study in a phosphate mine in Egypt," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Robert Brooks & Joshua A. Brooks, 2017. "An Option Valuation Framework Based On Arithmetic Brownian Motion: Justification And Implementation Issues," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 40(3), pages 401-427, September.
    4. Savolainen, Jyrki, 2016. "Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 49-65.
    5. Parviz Sohrabi & Hesam Dehghani & Behshad Jodeiri Shokri, 2022. "Determination of optimal production rate under price uncertainty—Sari Gunay gold mine, Iran," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 35(2), pages 187-201, June.
    6. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    7. Dybvig, Philip H. & Gong, Ning & Schwartz, Rachel, 2000. "Bias of Damage Awards and Free Options in Securities Litigation," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 149-168, April.
    8. Boyarchenko, Svetlana & Levendorskii[caron], Sergei, 2007. "Optimal stopping made easy," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 201-217, February.
    9. Robert C. Merton, 2006. "Paul Samuelson and Financial Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 50(2), pages 9-31, October.
    10. Ammann, Manuel & Kind, Axel & Wilde, Christian, 2003. "Are convertible bonds underpriced? An analysis of the French market," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 635-653, April.
    11. Helga Meier & Nicos Christofides & Gerry Salkin, 2001. "Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty---An Integrated Approach Using Contingent Claims Analysis and Integer Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 196-206, April.
    12. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    13. Kim, Amy M. & Li, Huanan, 2020. "Incorporating the impacts of climate change in transportation infrastructure decision models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 271-287.
    14. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    15. Lallouache, Mehdi & Abergel, Frédéric, 2014. "Tick size reduction and price clustering in a FX order book," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 416(C), pages 488-498.
    16. Juan M. Londono & Mehrdad Samadi, 2023. "The Price of Macroeconomic Uncertainty: Evidence from Daily Options," International Finance Discussion Papers 1376, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    17. Chia-Lin Chang & Tai-Lin Hsieh & Michael McAleer, 2016. "Connecting VIX and Stock Index ETF," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-010/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 23 Jan 2017.
    18. Bernard Dumas & Andrew Lyasoff, 2012. "Incomplete-Market Equilibria Solved Recursively on an Event Tree," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(5), pages 1897-1941, October.
    19. Guedes, José & Santos, Pedro, 2016. "Valuing an offshore oil exploration and production project through real options analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 377-386.
    20. Krzysztof S. Targiel & Maciej Nowak & Tadeusz Trzaskalik, 2018. "Scheduling non-critical activities using multicriteria approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(3), pages 585-598, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:25-40:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.