IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v5y2013i2p115-132n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South-Moravian Rural Borderland

Author

Listed:
  • Vaishar Antonín

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Šťastná Milada

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Trnka Pavel

    (Department of Applied and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Dvořák Petr

    (Department of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics, Czech Academy of Sciences Ostrava, Studentská 1768, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic)

  • Zapletalová Jana

    (Department of Environmental Geography, Institute of Geonics, Czech Academy of Sciences Ostrava, Drobného 28, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The South Moravian rural borderland has been studied as an example of peripheral countryside. It is defined by municipalities the cadastral districts of which border on the state frontiers. The borderland is considerably differentiated in dependence on the natural conditions, historic development, geographical position and subjective circumstances. The period after 1990 experienced a downturn in production sectors, development of the tertiary sector, quite positive demographic evolution with a positive migration balance (with some exceptions), further intensification of nature conservation and landscape protection, increased unemployment rate and lower standard of formal education. The strengths encompass the maintained and, in many cases, strictly protected landscape, suitable settlement structures with large villages, suitable conditions for agricultural activities, development of balneology and important transition position of the central part of the borderland. The weaknesses include, in particular, the distinctly seasonal character of tourism (short summer period), below-average education, poor condition of many local roads and exposedness of the territory to erosion. Opportunities include possibilities of international cooperation, support of non-production agriculture, demand for relevant forms of tourism, support of small and medium sized businesses. Threats are understood as the outflow of young and educated people, devastation of the environment through intensive farming and reduced economic competitive advantages. Strategies may consist in the preference of economic development or in focusing on the improvement of local inhabitants’ life quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaishar Antonín & Šťastná Milada & Trnka Pavel & Dvořák Petr & Zapletalová Jana, 2013. "South-Moravian Rural Borderland," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 115-132, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:115-132:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/euco-2013-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/euco-2013-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Krugman, 2011. "The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehak Majeed & Saeed Owais Mushtaq & Javaid Iqbal Khan, 2022. "Perspectives into the Industrialization Process of India Through the New Economic Geography Lens," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 20(2), pages 437-458, June.
    2. Eichengreen, Barry & Lafarguette, Romain & Mehl, Arnaud & Ferrari Minesso, Massimo, 2023. "Technology and the geography of the foreign exchange market," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Pokharel, Ramesh & Bertolini, Luca & te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Acharya, Surya Raj, 2021. "Spatio-temporal evolution of cities and regional economic development in Nepal: Does transport infrastructure matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Richard McGahey, 2023. "Policy, Empirical Analysis, and Equity: Challenges for Research," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 77-84, February.
    5. Kamila Borsekova & Samuel Koróny & Peter Nijkamp, 2022. "In Search of Concerted Strategies for Competitive and Resilient Regions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 607-634, September.
    6. Jian Wang & Junqian Xu, 2015. "Home market effect, spatial wages disparity: an empirical reinvestigation of China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 313-333, December.
    7. Tobias Franz, 2019. "Why ‘Good Governance’ Fails: Lessons from Regional Economic Development in Colombia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 776-785, July.
    8. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2011. "The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 295-307, March.
    9. Kurt A. Hafner, 2015. "Tax Competition and Economic Integration," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 45-61, February.
    10. Zhang, Min & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2024. "Government reform and innovation performance in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Giuseppe Francesco Gori & Renato Paniccià, 2015. "A structural multisectoral model with new economic geography linkages for Tuscany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 175-196, November.
    12. Miroslav Žižka & Vladimíra Hovorková Valentová & Natalie Pelloneová & Eva Štichhauerová, 2018. "The effect of clusters on the innovation performance of enterprises: traditional vs new industries," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 780-794, June.
    13. Crafts, Nicholas & Alexander Klein, Alexander, 2017. "A Long-Run Perspective on the Spatial Concentration of Manufacturing Industries in the United States," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 339, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    14. Wieland, Thomas, 2014. "Räumliches Einkaufsverhalten und Standortpolitik im Einzelhandel unter Berücksichtigung von Agglomerationseffekten: Theoretische Erklärungsansätze, modellanalytische Zugänge und eine empirisch-ökonome," MPRA Paper 77163, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2020. "Institutions and the fortunes of territories," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 371-386, June.
    16. Minoru Osawa & Takashi Akamatsu & Yuki Takayama, 2017. "Harris And Wilson (1978) Model Revisited: The Spatial Period‐Doubling Cascade In An Urban Retail Model," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 442-466, June.
    17. Carpenter, Craig Wesley & Fannin, J. Matthew, 2021. "Back to the Future: Re-Incorporation of `Metropolitan Character' in U.S. Core-Based Statistical Area Delineations," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 51(2), August.
    18. Miroslav ŽIŽKA & Natalie PELLONEOVÁ, 2019. "Do Clusters With Public Support Perform Better? Case Study Of Czech Cluster Organizations," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(33), pages 20-33, December.
    19. Jan Kluge & Robert Lehmann, 2013. "Marshall or Jacobs? New insights from an interaction model," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 33(2), pages 107-133, October.
    20. Olivier Sykes & Alexander Lord, 2011. "Whither a Europe of the (English) regions? Reflections on the prospects for the representation of English territorial interests in Europe," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(6-7), pages 486-499, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:115-132:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.