IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eurcou/v10y2018i2p340-354n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Infrastructure Services for Promoting Local Community Wellbeing in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Vaznonienė Gintarė

    (Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Faculty of Economics and Management, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Universitetas st. 10 - 408, LT-53361 Akademija,Kaunasdistr., Lithuania)

  • Kiaušienė Ilona

    (Business and Rural Development Management Institute, Faculty of Economics and Management, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Universitetas st. 10 - 408, LT-53361 Akademija,Kaunasdistr., Lithuania)

Abstract

Social infrastructure is largely related to various services for community, facilities and public spaces, relationships and networks among local community members. It is therefore obvious that social infrastructure could be viewed as an important factor for creating better opportunities for integration and participation in society, fostering functional capabilities of a community, acknowledging human rights, improving judgements related to overall life satisfaction. The links between social infrastructure services and focus on local community wellbeing in Lithuanian’s social science discourse has not been substantiated sufficiently yet. Consequently, this article aims at disclosing the importance of social infrastructure services in promotion of local community wellbeing. The research question of this article is formulated as follows: how social infrastructure services contribute and could promote wellbeing of local community. The methodological background is based on both theoretical and empirical findings pertaining to the topic. The research results have suggested that the need of local community for social infrastructure services should be evaluated more carefully in the context of wellbeing. These services have been found to play significant role in reaching a certain level of wellbeing in view of the place where people live, how they feel and how to evaluate the future of their living.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaznonienė Gintarė & Kiaušienė Ilona, 2018. "Social Infrastructure Services for Promoting Local Community Wellbeing in Lithuania," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 340-354, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:340-354:n:10
    DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0020
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/euco-2018-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonyuk, V. S. & Danilova, I. V. & Mitelman, S.A. & Bulikeyeva, A. Zh., 2015. "Regional social infrastructure management in the system of tools used for improving the quality of life for regional population," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(3), pages 395-407.
    2. Cavaye, Jim, 2001. "Rural Community Development - New Challenges and Enduring Dilemmas," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-16.
    3. Gopalakrishna B.V & D.S. Leelavathi, 2011. "Infrastructure and Human development in India: An Inter-state comparison," Journal of Global Economy, Research Centre for Social Sciences,Mumbai, India, vol. 7(4), pages 292-311, December.
    4. Valentina Antonyuk & Irina Danilova & Semen Mitelman & Anara Bulikeeva, 2015. "Regional Social Infrastructure Management as the Instrument for Improving the Quality of Life," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 53-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eneja Drobež & David Bogataj, 2022. "Legal Aspects of Social Infrastructure for Housing and Care for the Elderly—The Case of Slovenia," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Albert Irambeshya, 2024. "Older People Reimagining and Envisioning Preventive Care Through Land Acquisition: Evidence From Rwanda," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    2. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana, 2011. "Infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh : Economic and Social Infrastructure," MPRA Paper 49076, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Phuong T. Nguyen & Sam Wells & Nam Nguyen, 2019. "A Systemic Indicators Framework for Sustainable Rural Community Development," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 335-352, June.
    4. Heilbrunn, Sibylle, 2005. "Entrepreneurship, Social Capital and Community Development: The case of Israeli Kibbutz," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 33(2), pages 1-16.
    5. Alla G. GRYAZNOVA & Valentina S. ANTONYUK & Elena L. KORNIENKO, 2019. "Regional problems in managing communications infrastructure in the digital economy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 38-50, September.
    6. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Leaving no one behind in a participative integrated development planning process in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 277-291, December.
    7. Phuong T. Nguyen & Sam Wells & Nam Nguyen, 2021. "Systemic Indicators for Rural Communities in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 203-226, April.
    8. Navarro, Andres & Tapiador, Francisco J., 2019. "RUSEM: A numerical model for policymaking and climate applications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eurcou:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:340-354:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.