IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/enviro/v8y2020i1p9-17n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment for groundwater in the region of municipal landfill systems in Tychy-Urbanowice (Southern Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Rykała Wojciech

    (Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska Str. 60, Sosnowiec41-200, Poland)

  • Dąbrowska Dominika

    (Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Będzińska Str. 60, Sosnowiec41-200, Poland)

Abstract

An Environmental Risk Assessment is an efficient technical and analytical method for analyzing environmental impacts and it supports the decision-making process connected with projects variants by using historical data collection, identification of regional risk sources, probability and impact estimation of signal risk type. In this article, an Environmental Risk Assessment was performed for groundwater quality in the region of municipal landfills in Tychy-Urbanowice (Southern Poland) to assess the impact of various factors on the quality of groundwater in the region. The assessment used qualitative and quantitative risk analysis methods, including cause and consequence analysis, completion of an effect/probability matrix and utilization of the SWOT analysis method. The results of the assessment indicate that use of the SWOT analysis was the best method for groundwater risk assessment in the examined area. The analysis included an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of leachate and groundwater quality (using data from a groundwater monitoring system), simulation of the longevity of both the top and bottom security system, spatial planning and an assessment of the impact of other parameters on groundwater, terrain and climatic conditions. The overall result for this analysis for the likely potential groundwater hazard was a score of -4. For the purposes of further risk analyses, it is possible to consider additional factors that are likely to affect the water quality of the area under investigation or to use other methods that will be based on a time series analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Rykała Wojciech & Dąbrowska Dominika, 2020. "Risk assessment for groundwater in the region of municipal landfill systems in Tychy-Urbanowice (Southern Poland)," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 9-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:enviro:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:9-17:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/environ-2020-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2020-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/environ-2020-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phadermrod, Boonyarat & Crowder, Richard M. & Wills, Gary B., 2019. "Importance-Performance Analysis based SWOT analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 194-203.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang-Ching Chen, 2023. "An Improved Corpus-Based NLP Method for Facilitating Keyword Extraction: An Example of the COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Corpus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    3. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Debasish Roy, 2021. "An Exploration in SWOT Function and Formulation of SWOT Index (SWOTIN): A Cross-Country Empirical Study (2006 – 2015)," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 10(2), pages 53-66, December.
    5. Carla M. A. Pinto & Jorge Mendonça & Lurdes Babo & Francisco J. G. Silva & José L. R. Fernandes, 2022. "Analyzing the Implementation of Lean Methodologies and Practices in the Portuguese Industry: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Macias, A. & Kandidayeni, M. & Boulon, L. & Trovão, J.P., 2021. "Fuel cell-supercapacitor topologies benchmark for a three-wheel electric vehicle powertrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    7. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2021. "Toward Smart Land Management: Land Acquisition and the Associated Challenges in Ghana. A Look into a Blockchain Digital Land Registry for Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Yuan Yuan & Tianhui You & Tian’ai Xu & Xun Yu, 2022. "Customer-Oriented Strategic Planning for Hotel Competitiveness Improvement Based on Online Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-30, November.
    9. Ridoan Karim & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Mina Hemmati & Md Shah Newaz & Haroon Farooq & Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin & Muhammad Zulkipli & Jorge Alfredo Ardila-Rey, 2020. "RETRACTED: Paving towards Strategic Investment Decision: A SWOT Analysis of Renewable Energy in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    10. Ruihui Pu & Deimante Teresiene & Ina Pieczulis & Jie Kong & Xiao-Guang Yue, 2021. "The Interaction between Banking Sector and Financial Technology Companies: Qualitative Assessment—A Case of Lithuania," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Boonlert Jitmaneeroj, 2024. "Value relevance of multifaceted corporate social performance: how do country-specific factors matter?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Zikang Hao & Mengmeng Zhang & Kerui Liu & Xiaodan Zhang & Haoran Jia & Ping Chen, 2022. "Where Is the Way Forward for New Media Empowering Public Health? Development Strategy Options Based on SWOT-AHP Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Budsaratragoon, Pornanong & Jitmaneeroj, Boonlert, 2020. "A critique on the Corruption Perceptions Index: An interdisciplinary approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Maria José Sá, 2020. "The Potential of Organisations’ SWOT Diagnostic Assessment," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 9, July.
    15. Wu, Jie & Zhao, Narisa & Yang, Tong, 2024. "Wisdom of crowds: SWOT analysis based on hybrid text mining methods using online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    16. Thang Quyet Nguyen & Lan Thi Tuyet Ngo & Nguyen Tan Huynh & Thanh Le Quoc & Long Van Hoang, 2022. "Assessing port service quality: An application of the extension fuzzy AHP and importance-performance analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Lamrhari, Soumaya & Ghazi, Hamid El & Oubrich, Mourad & Faker, Abdellatif El, 2022. "A social CRM analytic framework for improving customer retention, acquisition, and conversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Mitra, Satanik & Jenamani, Mamata, 2020. "OBIM: A computational model to estimate brand image from online consumer review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 213-226.
    19. Federica Cisilino & Alessandro Monteleone, 2020. "Designing Rural Policies for Sustainable Innovations through a Participatory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Chengcai Tang & Qianqian Zheng & Pin Ng, 2019. "A Study on the Coordinative Green Development of Tourist Experience and Commercialization of Tourism at Cultural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:enviro:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:9-17:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.