IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ejothr/v13y2023i1p1-13n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Strategic Performance Measurement System and Organisational Performance Through the Lenses of Contextual Factors: Empirical Evidence from the Hotel Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Alphun Cihan

    (Faculty of Tourism, University of Kyrenia, Kyrenia, North Cyprus via Mersin 10, Turkey)

  • Turker Nuray

    (Safranbolu Faculty of Tourism, Karabuk University, Karabuk, Turkey)

  • Sainaghi Ruggero

    (Università IULM, Department of Business, Law, Economics, and Consumer Behaviour, Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The unprecedented effects of COVID-19 have been problematic for hotels. Therefore, implementing a performance measurement system (PMS) has become critical for hotel organisations. This study thus examined how the balanced scorecard (BSC) as a strategic PMS has a function in revealing hotel performance. Two contextual factors of hotels—external environmental uncertainty (EEU) and decentralised decision-making—were also investigated to understand their effects on the use of the BSC, which, in turn, determines hotel performance. A survey was conducted involving 145 four- and five-star hotels in Turkey. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was used to test the hypotheses. It was found that EEU is significantly related to decentralised decision-making but not to the BSC. Meanwhile, the BSC does not have an indirect effect on the relationship between EEU and hotel performance; however, it was found to act as a mediator between the decentralisation of decision-making and hotel performance. Finally, decentralised decision-making was found to act as a mediator between EEU and the BSC.

Suggested Citation

  • Alphun Cihan & Turker Nuray & Sainaghi Ruggero, 2023. "The Strategic Performance Measurement System and Organisational Performance Through the Lenses of Contextual Factors: Empirical Evidence from the Hotel Industry," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ejothr:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/ejthr-2023-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2023-0001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ejthr-2023-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sainaghi, Ruggero & Phillips, Paul & Zavarrone, Emma, 2017. "Performance measurement in tourism firms: A content analytical meta-approach," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 36-56.
    2. Sirilak Bangchokdee & Lokman Mia, 2016. "The role of senior managers’ use of performance measures in the relationship between decentralization and organizational performance," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 129-151, June.
    3. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Narayanan, V. K., 1984. "Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 33-47, January.
    4. Nudurupati, Sai S. & Garengo, Patrizia & Bititci, Umit S., 2021. "Impact of the changing business environment on performance measurement and management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Rodrigues, Ricardo & Samagaio, António & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2019. "The adoption of management control systems by start-ups: Internal factors and context as determinants," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 875-884.
    6. Hoque, Zahirul, 2004. "A contingency model of the association between strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance measurement: impact on organizational performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 485-502, August.
    7. Aguinis, Herman & Burgi-Tian, Jing, 2021. "Measuring performance during crises and beyond: The Performance Promoter Score," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 149-160.
    8. Odysseas Pavlatos, 2018. "Strategic Cost Management, Contingent Factors and Performance in Services," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 215-233, June.
    9. Henri, Jean-François & Wouters, Marc, 2020. "Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Maurice Gosselin, 2011. "Contextual factors affecting the deployment of innovative performance measurement systems," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 260-277, November.
    11. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey, 2016. "Contingent Factors, Extent of Budget Use and Performance: A Structural Equation Approach," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 91-106, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jafar Ojra & Abdullah Promise Opute & Mohammad Mobarak Alsolmi, 2021. "Strategic management accounting and performance implications: a literature review and research agenda," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Odysseas Pavlatos & Hara Kostakis, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Target Costing Functionality and Product Innovation: The Role of Information Systems," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 124-140, March.
    3. Ismail Elnihewi & Rapiah Mohamed, 2015. "Effect of Organisational Structure and Competition on Organisational Performance in Libyan Commercial Banks," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 7(6), pages 50-55.
    4. Shadi Alkhasawneh & Wan Anisah Binti Endut & Nik Mohd Norfadzilah Bin Nik Mohd Rashid, 2023. "The Influence of External Factors and Modern Management Accounting Techniques Adoption on Organizational Performance," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 145-168.
    5. Aimé Togodo Azon & Didier van Caillie & François Pichault, 2011. "Les déterminants du design des systèmes de contrôle de gestion dans les collectivités locales de l'Afrique au Sud du Sahara: une analyse empirique contingente des collectivités locales béninoises," Post-Print hal-00650586, HAL.
    6. MF. Arrozi Adhikara & Maslichah & Nur Diana & M. Basjir, 2022. "Organizational Performance in Environmental Uncertainty on the Indonesian Healthcare Industry: A Path Analysis," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 11, March.
    7. Bedford, David & Bisbe, Josep & Sweeney, Breda, 2022. "Enhancing external knowledge search: The influence of performance measurement system design on the absorptive capacity of top management teams," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Amizawati Mohd Amir, 2011. "The indirect effects of PMS design on Malaysian service firms' characteristics and performance," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 31-49, May.
    9. Hoque, Zahirul, 2005. "Linking environmental uncertainty to non-financial performance measures and performance: a research note," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 471-481.
    10. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey, 2016. "Contingent Factors, Extent of Budget Use and Performance: A Structural Equation Approach," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 91-106, March.
    11. Antonio Costantini & Filippo Zanin, 2017. "The Effect of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty on the Use and Perceived Usefulness of Strategic Management Accounting: Some Empirical Evidence," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 15(4 (Winter), pages 379-398.
    12. Solabomi Omobola Ajibolade, Ph.D, FCA, FIMLS, ACTI, 2013. "Drivers of Choice of Management Accounting System Designs in Nigerian Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 3(9), pages 45-57, July.
    13. Brache, Jose & Felzensztein, Christian, 2019. "Exporting firm’s engagement with trade associations: Insights from Chile," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 25-35.
    14. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    16. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    17. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    18. Rogério João Lunkes & Fabricia Silva da Rosa & Januário José Monteiro & Daiane Antonini Bortoluzzi, 2020. "Interactions among Environmental Training, Environmental Strategic Planning and Personnel Controls in Radical Environmental Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Stewart Jones & Nurul Alam, 2019. "A machine learning analysis of citation impact among selected Pacific Basin journals," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2509-2552, December.
    20. Vincent Chong & Kar Chong, 1997. "Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 268-276.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ejothr:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.