IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/buogeo/v50y2020i50p55-72n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The local community: an entity discriminated against in spatial decision-making in Poland?

Author

Listed:
  • Bednarek-Szczepańska Maria

    (Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The article concerns the legal dimension of local communities’ participation in selected aspects of shaping space in Poland. The results of the review of legal regulations are presented, including interpretations of regulations made by other authors. Examples taken from previous research were used to show the functioning of these regulations in practice and their consequences. The aim of the article is to assess the legal conditions for the participation of local communities in spatial planning, planning of protected areas and location of investments in Poland, in relation to selected theoretical concepts, as well as to assess the consequences of these conditions. In the legal dimension, the participation of the local community in shaping space is symbolic, in the terminology of the Arnstein ladder. The dominant model is a non-binding opinion on ready-made projects and plans, instead of collaboration in their creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bednarek-Szczepańska Maria, 2020. "The local community: an entity discriminated against in spatial decision-making in Poland?," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 50(50), pages 55-72, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:50:y:2020:i:50:p:55-72:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/bog-2020-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2020-0032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bog-2020-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Evan Goldstein & William Hale Butler, 2010. "Expanding the Scope and Impact of Collaborative Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 238-249, April.
    2. Torill Nyseth & Torill Ringholm & Annika Agger, 2019. "Innovative Forms of Citizen Participation at the Fringe of the Formal Planning System," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 7-18.
    3. Simin Davoudi, 2012. "The Legacy of Positivism and the Emergence of Interpretive Tradition in Spatial Planning," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 429-441, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baxter, Jamie Scott & Chatzichristos, Georgios & Christmann, Gabriela & Hennebry, Barraí & Kovanen, Sunna & Novikova, Marina & Olmedo, Lucas & Stoustrup, Sune W. & van Twuijver, Mara & Umantseva, Anna, 2020. "Social Enterprises in Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Innovative Troubleshooters in Action. Handbook for Practitioners," IRS Dialog 6/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    2. Andreas Aa. Christensen & Peter S. Andersen & Chris Kjeldsen & Morten Graversgaard & Erling Andersen & Kristoffer Piil & Tommy Dalgaard & Jørgen E. Olesen & Henrik Vejre, 2021. "Achieving Sustainable Nitrogen Management in Mixed Farming Landscapes Based on Collaborative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Torill Nyseth & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2019. "The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6.
    4. Yi, Fangxin & Deng, Dong & Zhang, Yanjiang, 2020. "Collaboration of top-down and bottom-up approaches in the post-disaster housing reconstruction: Evaluating the cases in Yushu Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China from resilience perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Eran Razin, 2015. "District plans in Israel: post-mortem?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 1246-1264, October.
    6. Geneviève Mireille Perron & John F. (Jack) Duffy, 2012. "Environmental and Business Communities of Practice: Graduate Students Comparing Community‐Relevant Language," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 170-182, March.
    7. Bednarek-Szczepańska Maria, 2019. "The Role of Local Communities in the Process of Siting of the Unwanted Facilities within the Rural Areas in Poland," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 63-94, December.
    8. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    9. Alyson Nicholds & John Gibney & Chris Mabey & Dan Hart, 2017. "Making sense of variety in place leadership: the case of England’s smart cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 249-259, February.
    10. Hanna Seydel & Sandra Huning, 2022. "Mobilising Situated Local Knowledge for Participatory Urban Planning Through Storytelling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 242-253.
    11. Robin Gutting & Maria Gerhold & Stefanie Rößler, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Population-Weighted Method Assessing the Social Amenity Provision," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 189-201.
    12. Davis, Emily Jane & Hajjar, Reem & Charnley, Susan & Moseley, Cassandra & Wendel, Kendra & Jacobson, Meredith, 2020. "Community-based forestry on federal lands in the western United States: A synthesis and call for renewed research," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    13. Windemer, Rebecca, 2019. "Considering time in land use planning: An assessment of end-of-life decision making for commercially managed onshore wind schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Ulrik Kohl & John Andersen, 2022. "Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital: How Corporatist Power Beats Sustainability," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 230-241.
    15. Vidmantė Giedraitytė & Rasa Smaliukienė & Tomas Vedlūga, 2022. "The Impact of Citizen Participation on Public Sentiments during Crises: Comparative Study of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Jan Lilliendahl Larsen & Martin Severin Frandsen, 2022. "Urban Drama: Power Mediation in Antagonistic Copenhagen," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 326-339.
    17. Walsh James A., 2019. "Visions and plans for regional development in Ireland," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 67(3), pages 7-39, August.
    18. Bruce Evan Goldstein & Anne Taufen Wessells & Raul Lejano & William Butler, 2015. "Narrating Resilience: Transforming Urban Systems Through Collaborative Storytelling," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(7), pages 1285-1303, May.
    19. Matthew Cook & Andrew Karvonen, 2024. "Urban planning and the knowledge politics of the smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 370-382, February.
    20. Miroslav Kopáček, 2021. "Land-Use Planning and the Public: Is There an Optimal Degree of Civic Participation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:buogeo:v:50:y:2020:i:50:p:55-72:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.