IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v6y2016i1p3-27n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Economics of the New Silk Road

Author

Listed:
  • Sárvári Balázs

    (Corvinus University of Budapest Fővám tér 8, Budapest 1093, Hungary)

  • Szeidovitz Anna

    (Corvinus University of Budapest Fővám tér 8, Budapest 1093, Hungary)

Abstract

What has now been coined the term XXI Century Silk Road had evolved from a speech given by Chinese premier Xi Jinping in Kazakhstan in 2013. It was initially a plan aimed at promoting the bilateral relations of China and its neighbors; however, the initiative had since then traversed the region’s borders and become a global project. This paper examines the Silk Road Economic Belt initiative in light of Chinese-EU relations. It reviews the initiation of the Silk Road Project and focuses on its political economic analysis through investigating the potential routes the Belt can take, the EU-Chinese trade and investment standings as well as the global political context that the increased cooperation and connection is likely to influence. The paper uses the Modern Silk Road concept as an example of China’s foreign policy in the wake of globalization and the emergence of a new multipolar world order. To set the stage we will begin with a political-economic approach of the New Silk Road. Highlighting the possibilities of Chinese high culture, which accommodate global governance, we state that the Modern Silk Road project is one of its materialized forms. The concept of the New Silk Road (together with the Eurasian Union) denies the previous era of corruption and personality cult and indicates a milestone in the development of China, proving that it is already a globally responsible power (Värk, 2015). Even if transport by land is significantly more expensive than transportation by sea, the New Silk Road may have significant advantages: It may take only two weeks, saving potentially a week in shipping time, and diversify China’s dependence on sea transport that could reduce the importance of its regional diplomatic conflicts. Already these aspects show that the purpose of the Modern Silk Road is basically not to explore cost-efficiency but to contribute to the establishment of a new, multipolar world order. The fact that the Modern Silk Road is a supply-driven concept in spite of the historical one underlines this argument. Even if politics dominate, henceforward directing the economic activities, we will nonetheless examine the China-Eastern European relations through the lenses of trade and investment as well. After the initial analysis and description of the Silk Road Economic Belt as a tool of Chinese foreign policy, the paper goes on to examine the potential routes the railway takes from China to Europe. It reviews the trade and investment ties that the two entities share and assesses how this initiative contributes to the rise of Europe and China beside the USA. Lastly, it outlines how various regional and global powers are affected by the renewal of the Silk Road.

Suggested Citation

  • Sárvári Balázs & Szeidovitz Anna, 2016. "The Political Economics of the New Silk Road," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 3-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:3-27:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2016-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2016-0001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2016-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xinru, 2010. "The Silk Road in World History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195338102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Osman TEKİR & Nesrin DEMİR, 2018. "The Impact of the New Silk Road Project on the Global System as an Economic and Political Instrument," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(38).
    2. G. D'Alessio, 2018. "Well-being, the Socio-economic Context and Price Differences: the North-South Gap," Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 471-498.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. George Cornel Dumitrescu, 2019. "Could Romania become a trade hub on the TEN-T and the Belt and Road initiative," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 7(1), June.
    2. Mihajlo Jakovljevic & Arcadio A. Cerda & Yansui Liu & Leidy García & Yuriy Timofeyev & Kristijan Krstic & John Fontanesi, 2021. "Sustainability Challenge of Eastern Europe—Historical Legacy, Belt and Road Initiative, Population Aging and Migration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Guimel Hernández-Garay, 2018. "Consumption of Chinese silk fabrics in Marseille and Seville, 1680 – 1840," Working Papers 18.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics, Quantitative Methods and Economic History.
    4. Bing Sun & Aida Andrades Valtueña & Arthur Kocher & Shizhu Gao & Chunxiang Li & Shuang Fu & Fan Zhang & Pengcheng Ma & Xuan Yang & Yulan Qiu & Quanchao Zhang & Jian Ma & Shan Chen & Xiaoming Xiao & So, 2024. "Origin and dispersal history of Hepatitis B virus in Eastern Eurasia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Ansofino, Anas & Zusmelia, Zubir, 2023. "Global Competitiveness of Trade in the West Coast of Sumatra from the Perspective of the Agglomeration of Economic Approach," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    6. Benjamin Nitsche, 2020. "Decrypting the Belt and Road Initiative: Barriers and Development Paths for Global Logistics Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:3-27:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.