IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ush/jaessh/v4y2009i4(10)_winter200980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knowledge Management €“ Necessity For The Modernization Of The Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Adina BÄ‚LAN

Abstract

If individuals and technologies can harmonize their intelligence under various forms, only the intelligent organizations will have the capacity to transform and coordinate these abilities for their own advantage by using informational technologies, by combining the most advanced software technologies with the newest management instruments in order to produce extremely efficient organizations. The information excess is a chronic phenomenon for the modern organization, so that the lack of the capacity to filter and use relevant information is a consequence of the inefficiency to manage the knowledge fund, of the lack of a clear strategy with a common purpose for personnel and team. Today, almost the intelligent organizations must manage and apply the entire knowledge fund, they must use instruments and technologies in order to build an informational architecture, having as a purpose the competitiveness in a turbulent and changing environment. The apportion of the information and knowledge of the organization, the exchange of information between employees, departments and even other companies are facilitated by the information and communication technology. Not all information are valuable, but in order to establish what information respond to the questions What? Where? How? When? and Why? instruments of knowledge management are needed in order to determine what knowledge is qualified to be intellectually active.

Suggested Citation

  • Adina BÄ‚LAN, 2009. "The Knowledge Management €“ Necessity For The Modernization Of The Organizations," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(4(10)_Win), pages 494-501.
    • Handle: RePEc:ush:jaessh:v:4:y:2009:i:4(10)_winter2009:80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jaes.reprograph.ro/articles/winter2009/BalanAdina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madalina Constantinescu, 2008. "Knowledge Management Through The Lens Of Innovation And Labour Productivity In A Knowledge Based Economy," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 3(2(4)_Summ).
    2. Yogesh Malhotra, 2000. "Knowledge Management and New Organization Forms: A Framework for Business Model Innovation," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 5-14, January.
    3. Valentin PUPEZESCU & Felicia IONESCU, 2008. "Advances In Knowledge Discovery In Databases," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 3(4(6)_Wint).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Andreea MARIN-PANTELESCU & Nicolae LUPU, 2009. "Skills For Tourist Services," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(2(8)_ Sum).
    3. Liao, Chechen & Chuang, Shu-Hui & To, Pui-Lai, 2011. "How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 728-736, July.
    4. Tove Brink, 2024. "Future Innovation Unleashed for Sustainability in Longitudinal Research in Micro- and Small-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    6. Muhammad Halilintar, 2018. "Cooperatives and Economic Growth in Indonesia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 611-622.
    7. Schiavone, Francesco & Paolone, Francesco & Mancini, Daniela, 2019. "Business model innovation for urban smartization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 210-219.
    8. Scuotto, Veronica & Nespoli, Chiara & Tran, Phuong Tra & Cappiello, Giuseppe, 2022. "An alternative way to predict knowledge hiding: The lens of transformational leadership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 76-84.
    9. Tihana Koprivnjak & Sunčica Oberman Peterka, 2020. "Business Model as a Base for Building Firms’ Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Monica COJOCARU, 2011. "Cultural Globalization in the Context of International Business," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(5), pages 993-999, December.
    11. Esterhuizen, D. & Schutte, C.S.L. & du Toit, A.S.A., 2012. "Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 354-364.
    12. Sebastian Ion CEPTUREANU & Eduard Gabriel CEPTUREANU, 2015. "Role of Knowledge Based Communities in Knowledge Process," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(2), pages 228-243, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    knowledge; knowledge management; intelligent organization; informational technologies; knowledge exchange; collaborative networks; apportion intelligent instruments;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ush:jaessh:v:4:y:2009:i:4(10)_winter2009:80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laura Stefanescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmuspro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.