IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v11y2020i4p29-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antitrust regulation of product ecosystems: The case study of Kaspersky Lab. – Apple Inc

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey E. Shastitko

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Natalia S. Pavlova

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia)

  • Nadezhda V. Kashchenko

    (AO Kaspersky Lab, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Implementation of the ecosystem business model can not only bring significant gains to a company, but also entail additional risks, including those of violating antitrust laws. The article analyses the Apple Inc. ecosystem, which has recently become the subject of a number of complaints from independent software developers and of antitrust investigations. The study shows how a unique position within the ecosystem can lead a company to market dominance. As a result, actions aimed at creating preferential conditions for the company’s services can be interpreted as restricting competition through fostering a discriminatory environment and preventing independent software developers from entering the market. The analysis is based on public information about Apple’s actions against third-party developers and the recent investigation into the company’s conduct in response to the complaint by Kaspersky Lab. The reason for the initiation of legal proceedings was Apple’s actions setting new rules for the App Store and resulting in improper functioning of the parental control application “Kaspersky Safe Kids”. Methodologically, the study relies on ecosystem theory and the theory of industrial organization. The main research method is case study. The research demonstrates how Apple’s actions can be interpreted in terms of such concepts as essential facilities, tying practices, aftermarkets, and leveraging of market power. These concepts are applicable to Apple’s conduct, including the closed type of the ecosystem built by the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey E. Shastitko & Natalia S. Pavlova & Nadezhda V. Kashchenko, 2020. "Antitrust regulation of product ecosystems: The case study of Kaspersky Lab. – Apple Inc," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 29-42, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:29-42
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/86/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2020/664
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Wareham & Paul B. Fox & Josep Lluís Cano Giner, 2014. "Technology Ecosystem Governance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1195-1215, August.
    2. Golovanova, S., 2013. "Competition Restriction Problem in the Markets Linked to the Markets of Essential Facilities," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 20(4), pages 110-132.
    3. Thierry Isckia, 2009. "Amazon's evolving ecosystem : a cyber-bookstore and application service provider," Post-Print hal-00464419, HAL.
    4. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Tobias Riasanow & David Soto Setzke & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, March.
    5. Fransman,Martin, 2010. "The New ICT Ecosystem," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521171205, January.
    6. Fransman,Martin, 2010. "The New ICT Ecosystem," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521191319, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanghoon Lee & Wonjoon Kim, 2017. "The knowledge network dynamics in a mobile ecosystem: a patent citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 717-742, May.
    2. Krancke, Jan & Vidal, Miguel & Fier, Andreas, 2012. "Changing the rules: Applying a more economic approach to dynamic telecom markets," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 66976, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Liebenau, Jonathan & Elaluf-Calderwood, Silvia, 2014. "Challenges to European internet business models: Governing a fragmented internet," 25th European Regional ITS Conference, Brussels 2014 101427, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Stamopoulos, Dimitrios & Dimas, Petros & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2022. "Exploring the structural effects of the ICT sector in the Greek economy: A quantitative approach based on input-output and network analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    5. García-Muñiz, Ana Salomé & Vicente, María Rosalía, 2014. "ICT technologies in Europe: A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 360-370.
    6. Cristiano Antonelli & Giuseppe Scellato, 2013. "Complexity and technological change: knowledge interactions and firm level total factor productivity," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 77-96, January.
    7. Bauer, Johannes M. & Shim, Woohyun, 2012. "Regulation and digital innovation: Theory and evidence," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60364, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Basole, Rahul C. & Park, Hyunwoo & Barnett, Brandon C., 2015. "Coopetition and convergence in the ICT ecosystem," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 537-552.
    9. Bauer, Johannes M. & Prado, Tiago S., 2020. "Lessons from Innovation Economics for Digital Platform Policy," ITS Conference, Online Event 2020 224846, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Binsfeld, Nico & Whalley, Jason & Pugalis, Lee, 2017. "An analysis of the structure, actors and interrelationships producing Luxembourg's ICT ecosystem," 28th European Regional ITS Conference, Passau 2017 169450, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Taylor, Richard D., 2017. "The next stage of U.S. communications policy: The emerging embedded infosphere," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1039-1055.
    12. Bauer, Johannes M. & Knieps, Günter, 2018. "Complementary innovation and network neutrality," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 172-183.
    13. Lee, Changjun & Hwang, Junseok, 2018. "The influence of giant platform on content diversity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 157-165.
    14. El-Moghazi, Mohamed & Whalley, Jason & Irvine, James, 2013. "European influence in ITU-R: The end of an era of dominance?," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88486, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    15. Amel Attour & Alain Rallet, 2014. "Le rôle des territoires dans le développement des systèmes trans-sectoriels d'innovation locaux : le cas des smart cities," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 253-279.
    16. Fazıl Gökgöz & Mustafa Taylan Güvercin, 2018. "Investigating the total factor productivity changes in the top ICT companies worldwide," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 791-811, December.
    17. Cristiano Antonelli, 2017. "Endogenous innovation: the creative response," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 689-718, November.
    18. Jing Huang & Hongqi Wang & Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Mengmeng Bao, 2020. "Exploring the Key Driving Forces of the Sustainable Intergenerational Evolution of the Industrial Alliance Innovation Ecosystem: Evidence from a Case Study of China’s TDIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    19. Hallingby, Hanne Kristine, 2014. "Analysing standardisation processes as technology trajectories in the mobile ecosystem: Implications for competition and innovation," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106858, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi, 2021. "Challenged by technology: the audiovisual landscape and the evolving regulatory framework in Europe," Post-Print halshs-03503856, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    closed ecosystem; mobile devices; antitrust law; abuse of dominance; discrimination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L12 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:29-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.