IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v25y2024i3p71-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of digital divide under the platform model development in the corporate sector of the economy

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey E. Plakhin

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Valery Zh. Dubrovsky

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Ekaterina S. Ogorodnikova

    (Ural State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

The existence of digital divide significantly hinders the development of a platform model in the corporate sector of the Russian economy, which in turn does not contribute to the active manifestation of the positive effects of digitalisation. The lack of methodological and empirical works describing digital divide in the corporate sector of the economy does not allow devising effective methods of solving this problem. The purpose of the article is to assess the digital divide that impede the establishment of a platform model in the corporate sector of the national economy. The research methodology is based on the theory of innovation, the concept of technological paradigm, and the concept of the fourth industrial revolution that substantiate the advantages of digitalization and explain economic growth from the perspective of technological progress. The main method is correlation analysis, which is performed on groups of indicators characterising the use of platform technologies by organisations and reflecting a number of other factors. The data on the use of software and digital technologies in organisations over the years from 2012 to 2022 is taken from the HSE University statistical publications. The findings allow concluding that the greatest importance for the development of a platform model in the corporate sector of the economy is held by the homogeneity of digital technologies used within an industry. The second important factor is the homogeneity in the use of software focused on the interaction with partners and the functioning of organisations in terms of access to broadband internet. The results obtained allow diagnosing the formation of a platform model by describing the digital and software technologies used by potential participants of digital platforms and business ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey E. Plakhin & Valery Zh. Dubrovsky & Ekaterina S. Ogorodnikova, 2024. "A study of digital divide under the platform model development in the corporate sector of the economy," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 71-89, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:25:y:2024:i:3:p:71-89
    DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2024-25-3-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jne.usue.ru/images/download/104/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jne.usue.ru/ru/2024/1471
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2658-5081-2024-25-3-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lois Labrianidis & Thanassis Kalogeressis, 2006. "The digital divide in Europe's rural enterprises," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 23-39, January.
    2. Vicente, María Rosalía & López, Ana Jesús, 2011. "Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 220-237, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olimpia NEAGU, 2019. "Digital Divide Gap Convergence Across European Union: The Role Of Urbanisation," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 4(1), pages 43-48.
    2. Ventura, Eva & Satorra, Albert, 2015. "A multiple indicator model for panel data: an application to ICT area-level variation," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Margarita Billon & Rocio Marco & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2017. "Innovation and ICT use in the EU: an analysis of regional drivers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1083-1108, November.
    4. Sadaf Bashir & Bert Sadowski, 2014. "General Purpose Technologies: A Survey, a Critique and Future Research Directions," Working Papers 14-02, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2014.
    5. Pick, James B. & Nishida, Tetsushi, 2015. "Digital divides in the world and its regions: A spatial and multivariate analysis of technological utilization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-17.
    6. Jun Wen & Hadi Hussain & Renai Jiang & Junaid Waheed, 2023. "Overcoming the Digital Divide With ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China’s Provincial Level," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    7. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    8. Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Constantin ANGHELACHE & Radu Titus MARINESCU, 2017. "The Developing The Information Society In The European Union And The Member States," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(9), pages 55-61, September.
    9. Kasilingam, Dharun Lingam, 2020. "Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Jung, Juan, 2014. "Regional inequalities in the impact of broadband on productivity: Evidence from Brazil," MPRA Paper 56177, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Chun-Hung A. Lin & Ho-Shan Lin & Ching-Po Hsu, 2017. "Digital Divide and Income Inequality: A Spatial Analysis," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 8, pages 31-43, May.
    12. Pick, James B. & Sarkar, Avijit & Johnson, Jeremy, 2015. "United States digital divide: State level analysis of spatial clustering and multivariate determinants of ICT utilization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 16-32.
    13. Lutz, Sebastian Uljas, 2019. "The European digital single market strategy: Local indicators of spatial association 2011–2016," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 393-410.
    14. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Coelho, Florângela Cunha & Ehrl, Philipp & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2020. "Internet access in recessionary periods: The case of Brazil," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 537(C).
    15. Hyunjung Kim & Mohsen Joshanloo, 2020. "Internet Access and Voicing Opinions: The Moderating Roles of Age and the National Economy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 121-141, July.
    16. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "Determinants of digitalization and digital divide in Sub-Saharan African economies: A spatial Durbin analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    17. Juan Lin & Zhou Yu & Yehua Dennis Wei & Mingfeng Wang, 2017. "Internet Access, Spillover and Regional Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Ceccobelli, M. & Gitto, S. & Mancuso, P., 2012. "ICT capital and labour productivity growth: A non-parametric analysis of 14 OECD countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 282-292.
    19. Sarkar, Avijit & Pick, James B. & Johnson, Jeremy, 2015. "Africa's digital divide: Geography, policy, and implications," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146339, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    20. Thonipara, Anita & Sternberg, Rolf G. & Proeger, Till & Haefner, Lukas, 2020. "Assessing the Digital Divide and its Regional Determinants: Evidence from a Web-Scraping Analysis," ifh Working Papers 25/2020, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh), revised 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    platform markets; digitalisation; business ecosystem; digital divide; infrastructure; correlation analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:25:y:2024:i:3:p:71-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.