IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v20y2019i5p42-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model for labour productivity management in the economy of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel A. Mikhnenko

    (Moscow University for Industry and Finance “Synergy”)

Abstract

Improving labour productivity is one of the key challenges faced by the Russian economy. Since 2018, Russia has been implementing the national project “Labour Productivity and Employment Support”. There are reasons to believe that the task of ensuring the required dynamics of productivity growth within the project needs further theoretical grounding. The scientific problem is that the change in the uncertainty of the project environment significantly affects the productivity growth. The optimal amounts of funding allocated at each of the project stages depend on the random factors, which makes it crucially important to take into account their intensity when planning the dynamics of productivity. The paper develops a stochastic mathematical economic model for managing the growth of labour productivity and substantiates its uses as a tool to solve the scientific problem. The author sets the scientific task to determine the intensity values of random factors, which make it possible to reach the project targets with the planned amount of funding. The methodological basis of the study rests on the concepts of economic growth, optimal control, and stochastic dynamic systems. The article assesses risks of irrational spending, presents scenarios of changing the project environment, and gives recommendations for adjusting the funding. The theoretical and practical significance of the study lies in the justification of the need for additional control over the expenditure of financial resources in order to avoid their irrational use under growing uncertainty. The research shows that reducing uncertainty through institutional changes will increase the intensity of funding without compromising the dynamic characteristics of the project. The author justifies the limitations and ways of using the developed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel A. Mikhnenko, 2019. "Model for labour productivity management in the economy of Russia," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(5), pages 42-60, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:5:p:42-60
    DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-5-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/85/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/ru/2019/840
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-5-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    3. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    4. T. W. Swan, 1956. "ECONOMIC GROWTH and CAPITAL ACCUMULATION," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 334-361, November.
    5. repec:oup:qjecon:v:129:y:2014:i:2:p:939-993. is not listed on IDEAS
    6. K. J. Arrow, 1971. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 11, pages 131-149, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. Bhattacharya, Mita & Narayan, Paresh, 2015. "Output and labor productivity in organized manufacturing: A panel cointegration analysis for India," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 171-177.
    8. Fan, Di & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "The impact of corporate label change on long-term labor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 96-108.
    9. Douglas Gollin & David Lagakos & Michael E. Waugh, 2014. "The Agricultural Productivity Gap," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(2), pages 939-993.
    10. Casey Ichniowski, 1990. "Human Resource Management Systems and the Performance of U.S. Manufacturing Businesses," NBER Working Papers 3449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Tarancón, Miguel-Ángel & Gutiérrez-Pedrero, María-Jesús & Callejas, Fernando E. & Martínez-Rodríguez, Isabel, 2018. "Verifying the relation between labor productivity and productive efficiency by means of the properties of the input-output matrices. The European case," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 54-65.
    12. McCullough, Ellen B., 2017. "Labor productivity and employment gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 133-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun, Bogang & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2015. "A neo-Schumpeterian perspective on the analytical macroeconomic framework: The expanded reproduction system," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 11-2015, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    2. Dakpogan, Arnaud & Smit, Eon, 2018. "The effect of electricity losses on GDP in Benin," MPRA Paper 89545, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Gancia, Gino & Zilibotti, Fabrizio, 2005. "Horizontal Innovation in the Theory of Growth and Development," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 111-170, Elsevier.
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2002:i:1:p:1-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Michael Peneder & Karl Aiginger & Gernot Hutschenreiter & Markus Marterbauer, 2001. "Structural Change and Economic Growth," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 20668, April.
    6. Robinson, James A. & Srinivasan, T.N., 1993. "Long-term consequences of population growth: Technological change, natural resources, and the environment," Handbook of Population and Family Economics, in: M. R. Rosenzweig & Stark, O. (ed.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 21, pages 1175-1298, Elsevier.
    7. Frédéric Lordon, 1991. "Théorie de la croissance : quelques développements récents [Deuxième partie : la redécouverte des rendements croissants]," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 37(1), pages 191-243.
    8. Cem Ertur & Wilfried Koch, 2007. "Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 1033-1062.
    9. Rehme, Günther, 2007. "Wissen und Neue Wachstumstheorie: Die Rolle von fachspezifischem Humankapital," Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics 189, Darmstadt University of Technology, Department of Law and Economics.
    10. Aykut Kibritçioglu, 2002. "On the Smithian origins of "new" trade and growth theories," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    11. Volker Grossmann & Thomas Steger, 2007. "Growth, Development, and Technological Change," CESifo Working Paper Series 1913, CESifo.
    12. Voosholz, Frauke, 2014. "A survey on modeling economic growth. With special interest on natural resource use," CAWM Discussion Papers 69, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).
    13. Long, N.V. & Wong, K.Y., 1996. "Endogenous Growth and International Trade: A Survey," Working Papers 96-07, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    14. Betts, Julian R., 1989. "Technological Change, Sectoral Shifts and the Distribution of Earnings: A Human Capital Model," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275217, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    15. Robert J. Barro, 2013. "Health and Economic Growth," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(2), pages 329-366, November.
    16. Ekaterina Ponomareva & Alexandra Bozhechkova & Alexandr Knobel, 2012. "Factors of Economic Growth," Published Papers 172, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, revised 2013.
    17. Minea, Alexandru, 2008. "The Role of Public Spending in the Growth Theory Evolution," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 5(2), pages 99-120, June.
    18. Robert M. Solow, 2000. "The neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 349-381.
    19. Juan M. Ocegueda Hernandez & Juan A. Meza Fregoso & C. Domingo Coronado García, 2013. "Impact Of Education On Economic Growth In Mexico, 1990-2008, Impacto De La Educacion En El Crecimiento Economico En Mexico, 1990-2008," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 75-88.
    20. Marian Pompiliu Cristescu & Raluca Andreea Nerișanu, 2021. "Sustainable Development with Schumpeter Extended Endogenous Type of Innovation and Statistics in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    21. López-Pueyo, Carmen & Barcenilla-Visús, Sara & Sanaú, Jaime, 2008. "International R&D spillovers and manufacturing productivity: A panel data analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 152-172, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic growth; labour productivity; mathematical economic model; scenario modelling; national project; funding; random factors; dynamics.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • Z21 - Other Special Topics - - Sports Economics - - - Industry Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:5:p:42-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.