IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v20y2019i1p13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factor model for assessing the state of the digital economy

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandr P. Sukhodolov

    (Baikal State University)

  • Ilya A. Slobodnyak

    (Baikal State University)

  • Valentina A. Marenko

    (Sobolev Institute of Mathematics)

Abstract

The research aims to examine the conceptual model of factors influencing the state of the digital economy and contributing to its effective management. Methodologically the research relies on the cognitive modelling, which develops as an interdisciplinary programme combining the theory of cognition, and artificial intelligence. Cognitive modelling encompasses the stages of constructing a problem field and a cognitive map in the form of digraph; agreeing expert assessments of mutual influence of factors using mathematical statistics; simulation experiment. The problem is solved by the methods that allow for cognitive aspects of percep tion, thinking, explanation, experience, and intuition of researchers. The process of solving the problem is oriented towards involvement of intellectual resources of a specialist to record notions about a problem situation in the form of a formal model, construct a hypothesis on the behaviour of the investigated system, and a forecast of its development. The authors suggest their cognitive model of factors affecting the state of the digital economy and present it in the form of a cognitive map or a weighted directed graph. The model features a particular set of factors with the maximum degree of generalisation and abstraction from concrete subsystems of economy. The authors created a software tool, the algorithm of which was based on the system of finitedifference equations and was implemented using cross-platform technologies that enabled its running without foreign software. This software tool is used to perform a simulation experiment, which demonstrates that the target factor of a cognitive model substantially depends on the control factor “investments”. The researchers determine present conditions for obtaining variants of unstable structure of a cognitive model. Experiments on different combinations of the input data may lead to the desired result of economic situation development

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandr P. Sukhodolov & Ilya A. Slobodnyak & Valentina A. Marenko, 2019. "Factor model for assessing the state of the digital economy," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 13-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:13-24
    DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/81/2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/en/issues-2019/790
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Juranek & Dirk Schindler & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2018. "Transfer pricing regulation and taxation of royalty payments," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 20(1), pages 67-84, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuangying Chen & Qiyue Li & Bo Lei & Na Wang, 2021. "Configurational Analysis of the Driving Paths of Chinese Digital Economy Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Niemann & Mariana Sailer, 2023. "Is analytical tax research alive and kicking? Insights from 2000 until 2022," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1149-1212, August.
    2. Regina Ortmann & Erich Pummerer, 2023. "Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(8), pages 1277-1307, October.
    3. Hayato Kato & Hirofumi Okoshi, 2022. "Economic Integration And Agglomeration Of Multinational Production With Transfer Pricing," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1325-1355, August.
    4. Joana Garcia, 2022. "Multinationals and services imports from havens: when policies stand in the way of tax planning," Working Papers w202214, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    5. Armando José Garcia Pires, 2023. "Ad-Valorem Taxes, Prices and Content Diversification in the News Market," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Jay Pil Choi & Jota Ishikawa & Hirofumi Okoshi, 2024. "Tax havens and cross-border licensing with transfer pricing regulation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(2), pages 333-366, April.
    7. Bornemann, Tobias, 2018. "Do transfer pricing rules distort R&D investment decisions?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 233, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    8. Haufler, Andreas & Schindler, Dirk, 2023. "Attracting profit shifting or fostering innovation? On patent boxes and R&D subsidies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    9. Laszlo Goerke, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(2), pages 310-331, April.
    10. Koethenbuerger, Marko & Mardan, Mohammed & Stimmelmayr, Michael, 2019. "Profit shifting and investment effects: The implications of zero-taxable profits," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 96-112.
    11. Chlond, Bettina & Germeshausen, Robert, 2024. "Impacts of ownership changes on emissions and industrial production: Evidence from Europe," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-016, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, revised 2024.
    12. Jay Pil CHOI & ISHIKAWA Jota & OKOSHI Hirofumi, 2019. "Tax Havens and Cross-border Licensing," Discussion papers 19105, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    13. Arnt Ove Hopland & Petro Lisowsky & Mohammed Mardan & Dirk Schindler, 2021. "Inflexibility in Income Shifting: Implications, Detection and Remedies," CESifo Working Paper Series 9384, CESifo.
    14. Michael Overesch & Dirk Schindler & Georg Wamser, 2024. "Design and Consequences of CFC and GILTI Rules: A Review and Potential Lessons for the Global Minimum Tax," CESifo Working Paper Series 11018, CESifo.
    15. S. Juranek & D. Schindler & A. Schneider, 2023. "Royalty taxation under tax competition and profit shifting," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1377-1412, November.
    16. Roberto Crotti, 2021. "Does Intangible Asset Intensity Increase Profit-Shifting Opportunities of Multinationals?," IHEID Working Papers 02-2021, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    17. Antonio De Vito & Martin Jacob & Dirk Schindler & Guosong Xu, 2023. "How Do Corporate Tax Hikes Affect Investment Allocation within Multinationals?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10272, CESifo.
    18. Valentine P. Vishnevsky & Viktoriia D. Chekina, 2018. "Robot vs. tax inspector or how the fourth industrial revolution will change the tax system: a review of problems and solutions," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 4(1), pages 6-26.
    19. MUKUNOKI Hiroshi & OKOSHI Hirofumi, 2022. "Antidumping on Tax-induced Dumping," Discussion papers 22063, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital economy; cognitive model; cognitive map; simulation experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.