IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2017i1p137-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Kuznetsov

    (Institute on Regional Economy Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • Juliia Rastova

    (SPb State University of economics (21, Sadovaya street, St. Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation)

  • Miron Rastov

    (Institute of Regional Economy of RAS)

Abstract

In the article, the authors consider the quality of life as an objective and its indicators as the criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of balanced spatial development. The problem of measuring the quality of life has a complex and integrated nature, therefore, we should develop the practice of ratings in its spatial comparisons. The article demonstrates the possibility of using the rating lists of the quality of life of Russian regions by the rating agency “RIA Rating†for 2013–2015 as an information tool for the analysis of the efficiency and effectiveness of the public development of the regional administration. The authors have concluded that with a consecutive growth of an average value of the integrated rating index of quality of life, the different ways of assessing the degree of differentiation of the regions according to the quality of life provide conflicting results. It is necessary to pay attention not so much to ranging and grading of regions as to their classification depending on to the nature of typical problems. Therefore, the rating scale is structured on the basis of the “problematic principle of regional grouping†. The authors have proposed the method of the gradation of the rating scale, allowing to take into account the direction of change of the region’s position in the ranking. The relevance of the rating as a key information tool to reduce the regional differentiation of the life quality of the population among the regulatory bodies and civil society will increase if: it is also used for other subnational entities of the Russian Federation; there is the use of econometric and computational capabilities of high-tech software systems for a posteriori analysis and models for strategic forecasting of the rankings; there is the search of a synergistic effect from a variety of estimates of the degree of spatial development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Kuznetsov & Juliia Rastova & Miron Rastov, 2017. "Rating Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 137-146.
    • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:137-146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/March_2017/ERMarch2017_137_146.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moulin,Hervi, 1991. "Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521424585, November.
    2. Sergey Valentinovich Kuznetsov & Nikolay Maratovich Mezhevich, 0. "New Practices of Territorial Governance in Russia and Quality of Life Management Issues," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 7.
    3. Vladimir Alexandrovich Plotnikov & Vladimir Alexandrovich Shamakhov, 0. "Strategies of Territorial Development and Quality of Life," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 7.
    4. Aleksandr Tatarkin, 2016. "Regional Targeting of the Economic Policy of the Russian Federation as an Institution of Regional Spatial Development," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 9-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ksenia Shvorina & Larisa Faleychik, 2018. "Main Directions of Migration Mobility in the Siberian and Far Eastern Federal Districts," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 485-501.
    2. Anastasia V. Vasilieva & Tatyana V. Morozova, 2023. "Tourism Development in Border Regions of Russia: Methodological Foundations of Typology and its Approbation," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(2), pages 242-269.
    3. Anna Bagirova & Olga Notman & József Veress, 2017. "Methods of Integrated Assessment of Megalopolis’s Micro-Districts on the Basis of Residents’ Opinions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1138-1150.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin L. Weitzman, 2015. "A Voting Architecture for the Governance of Free-Driver Externalities, with Application to Geoengineering," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(4), pages 1049-1068, October.
    2. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
    3. Núñez, Matías & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2017. "Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 9-17.
    4. Antonin Macé, 2017. "Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Working Papers halshs-01222200, HAL.
    5. Burak Can & Jens Leth Hougaard & Mohsen Pourpouneh, 2020. "On Reward Sharing in Blockchain Mining Pools," IFRO Working Paper 2020/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Ali Ihsan Ozkes & Remzi Sanver, 2017. "Procedural versus Opportunity-Wise Equal Treatment of Alternatives: Neutrality Revisited," Working Papers halshs-01613138, HAL.
    7. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2013. "A Multi-attribute Yardstick Auction without Prior Scoring," MSAP Working Paper Series 02_2013, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, revised Mar 2014.
    8. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Arkadii Slinko, 2015. "Distance rationalization of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(2), pages 345-377, September.
    9. Noghin, Vladimir D., 2006. "An axiomatization of the generalized Edgeworth-Pareto principle in terms of choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 210-216, September.
    10. Ng, W. -Y. & Choi, K. -W. & Shum, K. -H., 1996. "Arbitrated matching: Formulation and protocol," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 348-357, January.
    11. Takashi Hayashi, 2016. "Consistent updating of social welfare functions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(3), pages 569-608, March.
    12. Nadezda Pakhomova & Kurt Knut Richter & Viacheslav Zhigalov & Aleksandra Malova, 2017. "Management of Energy-Efficiency in the Context of New Climate Policy," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 183-195.
    13. Reuben, Ernesto & Riedl, Arno, 2013. "Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 122-137.
    14. Echenique, Federico, 2007. "Counting combinatorial choice rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 231-245, February.
    15. Garold Zborovskiy & Polina Ambarova, 2016. "Conceptual Foundations of Transition to the Nonlinear Models of Higher Education in the Region," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 1157-1166.
    16. Koji Yokote & Takumi Kongo & Yukihiko Funaki, 2021. "Redistribution to the less productive: parallel characterizations of the egalitarian Shapley and consensus values," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 81-98, July.
    17. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    18. Alex Coram, 2008. "Social choice and information: a note on the calculus of mappings from utility spaces," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2008-04, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    19. Pavel Popov & Igor Miretskiy & Elena Loginova, 2017. "Efficient Location of Distribution Centres and Warehouses in the Territory of a Region," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 871-882.
    20. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2016. "A Sealed-Bid Two-Attribute Yardstick Auction Without Prior Scoring," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 827-843, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:137-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.