IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2017i1p114-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economy of the Arctic “Islands†: The Case of Nenets and Chukotka Autonomous Okrugs

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Pelysov

    (Council of the Study of Productive Forces, Ministry of Economic Development)

  • Natalya Galtseva

    (North-East Complex Scientific Research Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of RAS)

  • Elena Atamanova

    (Institute of Economics Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

The article discusses the economy of Arctic «islands». These territories of the Russian Arctic are unavailable by transport all the year round and have considerable specificity in comparison with the other regions of the Russian and North European Arctic. The authors consider the economy of Arctic «islands» on the example of the Nenets and Chukotka Autonomous Areas. Despite the significant similarity in the economic and social parameters, after careful study, two regions show considerable internal differences. In order to identify dissimilarity, in the comparative analysis, we use the theoretical idea of the Arctic economy as a unity of three sectors — the traditional one, corporate (market) one and transfer (state) one. Each sector has the key contradictions, structures and its trajectory of evolution. The comparison of traditional sectors reveals significant landscape diversity of Chukotka in comparison with the Nenets tundra. The corporate sector of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug economy is significantly younger than in Chukotka, due to the fact that oil and gas development is relatively new practice for the region. On the other hand, because of the mining development of Chukotka gold, which started in 1960-s, it can be considered as an old industrial region. The level of the profitability of gold production is significantly lower than of the Nenets oil production. Therefore, we propose to include the economy of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug to the rental model, and Chukotka economy to the transfer model. The difference of transfer sectors of two areas is the result of not only the difference in the power of the regional budgets, but also of the urban settlement structure which is centralized in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug and polycentric in Chukotka. It means that the public health and culture in the Nenets Autonomous Okrug are dated generally for the capital of Naryan-Mar, and social facilities in Chukotka are significantly decentralized and concentrated in Okrug’s and regional centres.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Pelysov & Natalya Galtseva & Elena Atamanova, 2017. "Economy of the Arctic “Islands†: The Case of Nenets and Chukotka Autonomous Okrugs," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 114-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:114-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2017/March_2017/ERMarch2017_114_125.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee Huskey, 2006. "Limits to growth: remote regions, remote institutions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(1), pages 147-155, March.
    2. Nicholas A. Phelps & Miguel Atienza & Martin Arias, 2015. "Encore for the Enclave: The Changing Nature of the Industry Enclave with Illustrations from the Mining Industry in Chile," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(2), pages 119-146, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalya V. Galtseva & Oksana S. Favstritskaya & Olga A. Sharypova, 2022. "Prospects for modernization of regional economies in remote regions of Far North‐East Russia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 27-47, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N. Yu. Zamyatina & A. N. Pilyasov, 2018. "A New Interdisciplinary Scientific Field: Arctic Regional Science," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 215-224, July.
    2. Miguel Atienza & Patricio Aroca & Robert Stimson & Roger Stough, 2016. "Are vertical linkages promoting the creation of a mining cluster in Chile? An analysis of the SMEs' practices along the supply chain," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(1), pages 171-187, February.
    3. van Meeteren, Michiel & Kleibert, Jana, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    4. Gavin Bridge & Alexander Dodge, 2022. "Regional assets and network switching: shifting geographies of ownership, control and capital in UK offshore oil [Temporality and the evolution of GPNs: remaking BHP’s Pilbara iron ore network]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 367-388.
    5. Mark Lorenzen & Ram Mudambi & Andreas Schotter, 0. "International connectedness and local disconnectedness: MNE strategy, city-regions and disruption," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    6. Miguel Atienza & Marcelo Lufin & Moritz Breul, 2024. "(Un)linking industrial path development and development outcomes through asset mobilization: The decline of the territorial embeddedness of labor in mining regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2417, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2024.
    7. Michiel van Meeteren & Jana Kleibert, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ [Uneven and combined state capitalism]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    8. Valdes, Rodrigo & Jara-Rojas, Roberto, 2020. "The impact of commodity price shocks among regional economies of a developing country," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), July.
    9. Ghebrihiwet, Nahom, 2019. "FDI technology spillovers in the mining industry: Lessons from South Africa's mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 463-471.
    10. Gerardo Castillo & David Brereton, 2018. "Large‐scale mining, spatial mobility, place‐making and development in the Peruvian Andes," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 461-470, September.
    11. Bravo-Ortega, Claudio & Muñoz, Leonardo, 2021. "Mining services suppliers in Chile: A regional approach (or lack of it) for their development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Atienza, Miguel & Lufin, Marcelo & Soto, Juan, 2021. "Mining linkages in the Chilean copper supply network and regional economic development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Rodrigo Valdes & Roberto Jara‐Rojas, 2020. "The impact of commodity price shocks among regional economies of a developing country," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 920-939, July.
    14. Nicholas A. Phelps & Julie T. Miao & Zhigang Li & Sainan Lin, 2021. "From Socialist Subject to Capitalist Object: Industry Enclave Life Past and Present in Wuhan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 99-115, January.
    15. Stubrin, Lilia, 2017. "Innovation, learning and competence building in the mining industry. The case of knowledge intensive mining suppliers (KIMS) in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 167-175.
    16. Nicholas A Phelps & Miguel Atienza & Martin Arias, 2018. "An invitation to the dark side of economic geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(1), pages 236-244, February.
    17. Martín Arias-Loyola, 2021. "Evade neoliberalism’s turnstiles! Lessons from the Chilean Estallido Social," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(4), pages 599-606, June.
    18. Atienza, Miguel & Modrego, Félix, 2019. "The spatially asymmetric evolution of mining services suppliers during the expansion and contraction phases of the copper super-cycle in Chile," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 77-87.
    19. José Carlos Orihuela & Victor Gamarra Echenique, 2018. "Variegated dependence: The geographically differentiated economic outcomes of resource-based development in Peru, 2001-2015," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2018-458, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    20. Moritz Breul & Miguel Atienza, 2022. "Extractive Industries and Regional Diversification: A Multidimensional Framework for Diversification in Mining Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2213, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:114-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.