IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unt/jnapdj/v12y2005i1p1-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade cooperation and performance in East and South Asia: towards a future integration

Author

Listed:
  • Biswajit Nag

    (Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, India)

Abstract

On paper free trade and open economies maximize global efficiency in the production and distribution of both goods and services. However, in the real world where distortions are the norm the ideal of free trade is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve. In consequence, countries and economies have become increasingly involved in the pursuit of the “second-best” solution in the form of regional or subregional free trade arrangements. This paper examines the rationale for, and impact of, these arrangements in the ESCAP region and suggests that there is considerable potential for further trade cooperation between the various free trade arrangements formed in the different subregions of ESCAP. In this regard, the paper makes a number of recommendations that emphasize the need for the bigger economies of the region to take the lead in furthering trade liberalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Biswajit Nag, 2005. "Trade cooperation and performance in East and South Asia: towards a future integration," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:12:y:2005:i:1:p:1-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/apdj12-1-1-nag.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathie Krumm & Homi Kharas, 2004. "East Asia Integrates : A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15038.
    2. Mordechai E. Kreinin & Michael G. Plummer, 2002. "Economic Integration and Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2426.
    3. Finger, J M & Kreinin, M E, 1979. "A Measure of 'Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(356), pages 905-912, December.
    4. Emiko Fukase & Will Martin, 2001. "Free Trade Area Membership as a Stepping Stone to Development : The Case of ASEAN," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13847.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samina Shabir & Reema Kazmi, 2007. "Economic Effects of the Recently Signed Pak-China Free Trade Agreement," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(Special E), pages 174-202, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doukoure Charle Fe, 2021. "Trade flows between the West African Economic and Monetary Union's members so little: does exports structure matter ?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 816-833.
    2. Zelal Kotan & Serdar Sayan, 2001. "A Comparison Of The Price Competitiveness Of Turkish And South East Asian Exports In The European Union Market In The 1990s," Discussion Papers 0102, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    3. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Bahar, Dany & Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A., 2014. "Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 111-123.
    5. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq, 2019. "Latency and Economic Concert of India’s Trade with Russia: An Empirical Investigation," MPRA Paper 104616, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Nov 2020.
    6. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    7. Jerome Trotignon, 2005. "EMU Enlargement to Include CEE Countries: Risks of Sector-based and Geographical Asymmetric Shocks," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21.
    8. Scrieciu, Silviu Serban, 2004. "Assessing the Economic Impacts of Incorporating Romania's Agricultural and Food Sectors into EU's Customs Union: An Applied General Equilibrium Approach," Development Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 30543, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    9. Mr. Tubagus Feridhanusetyawan, 2005. "Preferential Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region," IMF Working Papers 2005/149, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Rozakis, Stelios, 2011. "Impacts of flatter rates and environmental top-ups in Greece: A novel mathematical modeling approach," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(2).
    11. Elsner, Karin & Hartmann, Monika, 1998. "Convergence Of Food Consumption Patterns Between Eastern And Western Europe," IAMO Discussion Papers 14875, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    12. Baliamoune-Lutz, Mina, 2019. "Trade sophistication in developing countries: Does export destination matter?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 39-51.
    13. Evzen Kocenda & Karen Poghosyan, 2017. "Export sophistication: A dynamic panel data approach," Working Papers 980, Central Bank of the Republic of Armenia.
    14. Rolf J. Langhammer, 2005. "The EU Offer of Service Trade Liberalization in the Doha Round: Evidence of a Not‐Yet‐Perfect Customs Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 311-325, June.
    15. Mark Thissen & Frank van Oort & Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argilés & Trond Husby, 2020. "The Implications of Brexit for UK and EU Regional Competitiveness," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(5), pages 397-421, October.
    16. Seda Ekmen Ozcelik, 2018. "The Potential Effects of TPP, TTIP and Trump's Tariffs on China's Competitiveness in the US Market," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 95-115, December.
    17. Marie-Line Duboz & Julie Le Gallo, 2011. "Are EU-15 and CEEC agricultural exports in competition? Evidence for 1995-2005," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(1), pages 134-146.
    18. Isabel Proença & Maria Fontoura & Enrique Martínez-Galán, 2008. "Trade in the enlarged European Union: a new approach on trade potential," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 7(3), pages 205-224, December.
    19. Edward E. Leamer, 2010. "What Have Changes to the Global Markets for Goods and Services Done to the Viability of the Swedish Welfare State?," NBER Chapters, in: Reforming the Welfare State: Recovery and Beyond in Sweden, pages 285-325, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unt:jnapdj:v:12:y:2005:i:1:p:1-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Macroeconomic Policy and Development Division, ESCAP (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escapth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.