IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ukm/jlekon/v32y1998ip75-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare Gains and Losses under the Malaysian Rice Pricing Policy and their Relationships to the Self-Sufficiency Level

Author

Listed:
  • mustapha, nik hashim

    (Faculty of Economics Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 UKM Bangi Selangor Darul Ehsan)

Abstract

An applied welfare economics approach was utilised to analyse the impact of public policy 011 the rice industry arising from the adoption of a price control programme. Taking market clearing equilibrium price under the assumption of a closed economy, the imposition of price comrol was found to favour consumers at the expense of producers. Based on the 1992 equilibrium price level, welfare gain accrued to the consumers as represented by the conswneds surplus, was estimated at RM205 thousand per year: while a reduction ill the produceds surplus. constituting a welfare loss, was estimated at RM 188 thousand. Excess demand resulting from the existing pricing policy was supplemented by rice imports. amounting to 2,535 metric tons during the year. The amount of government spending on rice import was RM248 thousand for the year. In total, there was a negative net welfare effect of RM232 thousand for the year analysed. The paper also discussed the interrelationship between pricing policy and the level of self-sufficienc)’, since for every level of controlled prices, corresponding quantities of rice supplied and demanded CGn be obtained. Hence, an appropriate pricing policy may be chosen to acquire the required level of rice self-sufficiency in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • mustapha, nik hashim, 1998. "Welfare Gains and Losses under the Malaysian Rice Pricing Policy and their Relationships to the Self-Sufficiency Level," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 32, pages 75-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:32:y:1998:i::p:75-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ukm.my/jem/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/jeko_32-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. R. Hicks, 1943. "The Four Consumer's Surpluses," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 31-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas E. Flores & Philip E. Graves, 2008. "Optimal Public Goods Provision: Implications of Endogenizing the Labor/Leisure Choice," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 701-707.
    2. Sinden, Jack A., 1978. "Estimation Of Consumer'S Surplus Values For Land Policies," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Natale Arcuri & Manuela De Ruggiero & Francesca Salvo & Raffaele Zinno, 2020. "Automated Valuation Methods through the Cost Approach in a BIM and GIS Integration Framework for Smart City Appraisals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Smith, V. Kerry & van Houtven, George & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K., 1999. "Benefit Transfer as Preference Calibration," Discussion Papers 10607, Resources for the Future.
    5. Yew-Kwang Ng, 2010. "Consumer Surplus," Chapters, in: Mark Blaug & Peter Lloyd (ed.), Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Mario Fortuna & Francisco Silva & Ana Medeiros, 2016. "A CGE approach to measuring the impacts of EU structural funds in a small open economy," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(3), pages 507-538, August.
    7. Dikgang, Johane & Muchapondwa, Edwin, 2012. "The valuation of biodiversity conservation by the South African Khomani San “bushmen” community," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 7-14.
    8. Fleissig, Adrian R. & Whitney, Gerald, 2011. "A revealed preference test of rationing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 234-236.
    9. Randall, Alan, 1982. "Economic Surplus Concepts and Their Use in Benefit Cost Analysis," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-29, August.
    10. Pope, Rulon D., 1985. "The Impact Of Information On Consumer Preferences," Research on Effectiveness of Agricultural Commodity Promotion, April 9-10, 1985, Arlington, Virginia 279489, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    11. Erik Angner, 2011. "Current Trends in Welfare Measurement," Chapters, in: John B. Davis & D. Wade Hands (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Recent Economic Methodology, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Sinden, Jack A., 1980. "Pangloss, Pandora and Pareto for the Aspiring Benefit-Cost Analyst," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(02), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Helen Scarborough & Jeff Bennett, 2012. "Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distributional Preferences," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14376.
    14. Patric H. Hendershott & Sheng Hu, 1982. "Accelerating Inflation and Nonassumable Fixed-Rate Mortgages: Effects On Consumer Choice and Welfare," Public Finance Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 158-184, April.
    15. Trond Husby & Henri L. F. de Groot & Marjan W. Hofkes & Tatiana Filatova, 2018. "Flood protection and endogenous sorting of households: the role of credit constraints," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 147-168, February.
    16. Min Qiang Zhao & Ju-Chin Huang, 2018. "The Representative Consumer Approximation Bias in Discrete Choice Welfare Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(4), pages 969-984, December.
    17. H. Spencer Banzhaf, 2021. "Difference-in-Differences Hedonics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(8), pages 2385-2414.
    18. Eddie Chi Man Hui, 1999. "Willingness to Pay for Better Housing in Hong Kong: Theory and Evidence (of Dwelling Space)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(2), pages 289-304, February.
    19. Sardaro, Ruggiero & Faccilongo, Nicola & Roselli, Luigi, 2019. "Wind farms, farmland occupation and compensation: Evidences from landowners’ preferences through a stated choice survey in Italy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Meilan Jin & Yuxian Juan & Youngjoon Choi & Choong-Ki Lee, 2019. "Estimating the Preservation Value of World Heritage Site Using Contingent Valuation Method: The Case of the Li River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:32:y:1998:i::p:75-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Asri Abd Ghani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feukmmy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.