IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jsbuii/v15y2011i1id3191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kepemilikan Ultimat, Tingkat Risiko, Efisiensi dan Kinerja Industri Perbankan di Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Surifah Surifah

Abstract

The research empirically verified the effect of ultimate ownership on industrial banking performance in Indonesia. Risk rate, efficiency, and general performance serve as proxy for bank performance. Based on multiple-regression test and Kruskal-Wallis test, the performance rank in terms of risk rate, efficiency and general banking performance were as follows, (1) mixed foreign and domestic banks, (2) foreign banks, (3) local governmental banks, (4) Indonesian national governmental banks, (5) family banks, (6) concentrated private banks, and (7) block shareholding private insititutions. The percentage of the ultimate ownership did not affect the risk rate, efficiency and general banking performance; but significantly and positively affected profit growth. The bank size has negative effect on the risk indicator, ETA and CAR. The bank size negatively affected BOPO. The bank size positively affects on DEA meaning bigger bank is more efficient. Bank did not significantly differ in general performance – which was measured with ROA and profit growth – but significantly and positively affected ROE.Keywords: ultimate ownership, risk, efficiency, performanceAbstrakPenelitian ini secara empiris memverifikasi pengaruh kepemilikan ultimat pada kinerja industri perbankan di Indonesia. Berdasarkan uji regresi berganda dan Kruskal-Wallis, peringkat kinerja dalam hal tingkat resiko, efisiensi dan kinerja perbankan secara umum adalah sebagai berikut (1) bank asing dan domestik digabung, (2) bank asing, (3) bank pemerintah daerah, (4) bank pemerintah nasional, (5) bank keluarga, (6) bank swasta terkonsentrasi, dan (7) kepemilikan saham institusi swasta. Persentase kepemilikan akhir tidak mempengaruhi tingkat resiko, efisiensi dan kinerja perbankan secara umum, tetapi secara signifikan dan positif mempengaruhi pertumbuhan laba. Ukuran Bank memiliki efek negatif pada indikator risiko, ETA dan CAR. Ukuran Bank secara negatif mempengaruhi BOPO. Ukuran Bank secara positif mempengaruhi DEA. Bank tidak berbeda secara signifikan dalam kinerja umumnya yang diukur dengan ROA dan pertumbuhan laba, tetapi kinerja ini secara signifikan dan positif mempengaruhi ROE.Kata kunci: kepemilikan akhir, risiko, kinerja, industri perbankan, efisiensi

Suggested Citation

  • Surifah Surifah, 2011. "Kepemilikan Ultimat, Tingkat Risiko, Efisiensi dan Kinerja Industri Perbankan di Indonesia," Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, Management Development Centre (MDC) Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 15(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:uii:jsbuii:v:15:y:2011:i:1:id:3191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/view/3191/2900
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulik Hertina Wuni Astuti & Putu Mahardika Adi Saputra, 2019. "Efficiency and Competition in Banking Industry: Case for ASEAN-5 Countries," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 66(2), pages 141-152, June.
    2. Ulik Hertina Wuni Astuti & Putu Mahardika Adi Saputra, 2019. "Efficiency and Competition in Banking Industry: Case for ASEAN-5 Countries," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, issue 2, pages 141-152, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jsbuii:v:15:y:2011:i:1:id:3191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.