IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jrambr/v1y2021i1p46-56id17674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of volatility and performance of shares in Indonesia, Malaysia, China and America (Study on the content, FBMS, DJICHKU and DJIMI)

Author

Listed:
  • Resti Wulandari

Abstract

Starting from the trade war between the United States and China in 2018-2019 shows the challenges of a global economic slowdown which is characteristic of the domestic economy, namely the performance of the capital market and the volatility of stock prices, causing the capital development market to experience a decline from 2015-2019 which has an impact on the Indonesian capital market. Malaysia, China and America. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of the volatility difference test and the performance of Islamic stocks in Indonesia (ISSI), Malaysia (FBMS), China (DJICHKU) and America (DJIMI) and to see whether Indonesia's volatility is lower than the three countries and the performance of the Indonesian stock exchange. better than the other three countries. This type of research is comparative descriptive. The sampling technique used saturated sampling, namely all Islamic stocks that are members of the four countries. This study uses the ARCH/GARCH model to estimate volatility and calculate performance using the Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen methods using re-measurement different test tools. The results show that the volatility of Indonesian stock prices (ISSI) is not lower when compared to the three countries because Indonesia's volatility is at the second level and for the performance of Indonesian Islamic stocks (ISSI) has a better performance when measured by Jensen. method, if using the American treynor method. have a better performance than Indonesia, Malaysia and China.

Suggested Citation

  • Resti Wulandari, 2021. "Comparison of volatility and performance of shares in Indonesia, Malaysia, China and America (Study on the content, FBMS, DJICHKU and DJIMI)," Asian Management and Business Review, Master of Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 1(1), pages 46-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:uii:jrambr:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:46-56:id:17674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/AMBR/article/view/17674
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jrambr:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:46-56:id:17674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/AMBR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.