IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/mresec/doi10.1086-697152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris at Southern California Beaches: A Random Utility Travel Cost Model

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher G. Leggett
  • Nora Scherer
  • Timothy C. Haab
  • Ryan Bailey
  • Jason P. Landrum
  • Adam Domanski

Abstract

A random utility maximization (RUM) travel cost model is used to characterize trips to beaches by residents of Orange County, CA. The authors collected on-site measurements of marine debris at 31 beaches in the Orange County area. These data, combined with data on beach trips obtained from a general population survey, were used to estimate a RUM model capable of isolating the impact of marine debris on beach choice. The model is used to estimate the economic benefits associated with several hypothetical reductions in marine debris. The estimated per capita seasonal benefit associated with a 25% reduction in marine debris at all beaches in the choice set is $12.91 (aggregate benefits of $29.5 million in 2013 dollars), while the estimated per capita seasonal benefit associated with a hypothetical improvement potentially associated with the full implementation of the Los Angeles River Trash total maximum daily load (TMDL) is $20.36 (aggregate benefits of $46.5 million).

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher G. Leggett & Nora Scherer & Timothy C. Haab & Ryan Bailey & Jason P. Landrum & Adam Domanski, 2018. "Assessing the Economic Benefits of Reductions in Marine Debris at Southern California Beaches: A Random Utility Travel Cost Model," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 133-153.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/697152
    DOI: 10.1086/697152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697152
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/697152
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/697152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tobias Börger & Nick Hanley & Robert J. Johnston & Keila Meginnis & Tom Ndebele & Ghamz E. Ali Siyal & Frans de Vries, 2024. "Equity preferences and abatement cost sharing in international environmental agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 416-441, January.
    2. Khedr, Salma & Rehdanz, Katrin & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter & Dijkstra, Hanna & Duijndam, Sem & Okoli, Ikechukwu C., 2023. "Public preferences for marine plastic litter management across Europe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    3. E. I. Ahmad-Kamil & Sharifah Zarina Syed Zakaria & Murnira Othman, 2022. "What Teachers Should Know for Effective Marine Litter Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Carlo Fezzi & Mauro Derek J. Ford & Kirsten L.L. Oleson, 2022. "The economic value of coral reefs: climate change impacts and spatial targeting of restoration measures," DEM Working Papers 2022/5, Department of Economics and Management.
    5. Salma Khedr & Katrin Rehdanz & Roy Brouwer & Hanna Dijkstra & Sem Duijndam & Pieter van Beukering & Ikechukwu C. Okoli, 2021. "Public preferences for marine plastic litter reductions across Europe," Papers 2107.03957, arXiv.org.
    6. Fezzi, Carlo & Ford, Derek J. & Oleson, Kirsten L.L., 2023. "The economic value of coral reefs: Climate change impacts and spatial targeting of restoration measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/697152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MRE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.