IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/v26y1997i2p377-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Design and the Evolution of Commercial Norms

Author

Listed:
  • Kraus, Jody S

Abstract

The Uniform Commercial Code determines the content of most commercial law default rules by incorporating common merchant practices. The success of this incorporation strategy depends on the likely efficiency of evolved commercial practices. In this Article, I use the best available theory of cultural evolution to analyze how and why Commercial practices evolve. This analysis confirms that the incorporation strategy is far superior to a system in which lawmakers rely predominantly on individual analysis and experimentation to design commercial law. But the analysis also demonstrates that common commercial practices, and the laws incorporating them, are unlikely to be optimal, in the sense that they cannot be improved at any cost. There is good reason, then, to explore supplemental strategies for enhancing the efficiency of individual commercial practices on a selected basis. The viability of such strategies will depend on their costs and likely success in improving on commercial practice. Copyright 1997 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Kraus, Jody S, 1997. "Legal Design and the Evolution of Commercial Norms," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 377-411, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:26:y:1997:i:2:p:377-411
    DOI: 10.1086/468001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468001
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/468001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:26:y:1997:i:2:p:377-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.