IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-727465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expecting Corporate Prosociality

Author

Listed:
  • Hajin Kim

Abstract

This paper develops and tests a theory of stakeholders’ expectations and corporate prosociality: Stakeholders taught to believe that corporations cannot and should not sacrifice profits for society will be less willing to reward and punish corporations for their societal impacts. Firms will then have less incentive to care about their social impacts. In two preregistered studies with nearly 1,300 participants, Amazon Mechanical Turk workers taught an exclusive profit-maximization norm were less likely to sign a real petition against Amazon than those taught that firms can and should care about society. Exclusive profit maximization led participants to believe that it was less appropriate and effective for employees to push for social change, that fewer firms would care, and that fewer other people would protest. Expectations of corporate prosociality—rather than of exclusive profit maximization—could thus make it easier for firms to do well by doing good.

Suggested Citation

  • Hajin Kim, 2024. "Expecting Corporate Prosociality," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(2), pages 267-296.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/727465
    DOI: 10.1086/727465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727465
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/727465
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/727465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/727465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.