IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlabec/doi10.1086-712948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observational Studies of the Effect of Medicaid on Health: Controls Are Not Enough

Author

Listed:
  • Seth Freedman
  • Andrew Goodman-Bacon
  • Noah Hammarlund

Abstract

Covariate-adjusted cross-sectional comparisons show that Medicaid patients have worse health outcomes than other patients. We evaluate the validity of this research design for estimating the causal effect of Medicaid on mortality. Even after controlling for common covariates, Medicaid patients have worse preoperative health and lower socioeconomic status than privately insured patients. Controlling for additional variables shrinks the mortality differences but still does not eliminate imbalance in other predetermined variables. These results can be explained by fairly weak assumptions about unmeasured confounders. We conclude that cross-sectional observational methods do not produce valid causal estimates of Medicaid’s mortality effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth Freedman & Andrew Goodman-Bacon & Noah Hammarlund, 2021. "Observational Studies of the Effect of Medicaid on Health: Controls Are Not Enough," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(S2), pages 619-650.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:doi:10.1086/712948
    DOI: 10.1086/712948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712948
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/712948
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/712948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:doi:10.1086/712948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JOLE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.