IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-733111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge, Morality, and the Appeal of Counterfeit Luxury Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Ludovica Cesareo
  • Silvia Bellezza

Abstract

Counterfeiting is a negative phenomenon, bearing undesirable consequences for both companies and consumers of the original brands. Yet some consumers, while acknowledging the immorality of counterfeiting, still have positive predispositions toward such fake products. Why? We investigate consumers’ reactions to counterfeits as a function of consumers’ subjective knowledge in the domain of fashion and luxury goods. Four studies demonstrate that low-knowledge consumers react more positively to counterfeits than high-knowledge consumers because they are more morally disengaged and view these reproductions as acceptable. The findings offer actionable guidance to managers on how and where to concentrate their anticounterfeiting efforts depending on the average level of knowledge and moral disengagement of their customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludovica Cesareo & Silvia Bellezza, 2025. "Knowledge, Morality, and the Appeal of Counterfeit Luxury Goods," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(1), pages 58-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/733111
    DOI: 10.1086/733111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733111
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/733111
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/733111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/733111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.