IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-732915.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acting Immorally to Self-Enhance: The Role of Diagnostic Self-Deception

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Loughran Dommer

Abstract

Consumers often behave immorally toward companies for free products and services. But will they engage in immoral behaviors, such as cheating, when the rewards are purely intrinsic (e.g., feeling smarter, healthier)? This research proposes that consumers naturally cheat for such intrinsic rewards as this allows them to deceive themselves about some positive aspect of their self-concept. That is, people falsely believe their enhanced performance is not the result of cheating but instead attributable to their inherent ability. Across four studies using a variety of cheating tasks, the results demonstrate that when the opportunity to cheat offers the intrinsic incentive of positively affecting a self-aspect, individuals perform better (i.e., cheat), engage in diagnostic self-deception, and subsequently enhance their self-perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Loughran Dommer, 2025. "Acting Immorally to Self-Enhance: The Role of Diagnostic Self-Deception," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(1), pages 47-57.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/732915
    DOI: 10.1086/732915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732915
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/732915
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/732915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/732915. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.