IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-731917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Three Musketeers? The Roles of Authenticity, Justice, and Empathy in Consumer Responses to Brand-Issue Incongruence

Author

Listed:
  • Serwaa Karikari
  • Michael A. Callow
  • Xingxing Zu

Abstract

Today’s brands must navigate the complexity of consumer expectations regarding their involvement in social justice issues. Consumers can respond in considerably different ways toward brand activism events. Research suggests that brand-issue incongruence (BII) has an impact on consumer responses. Across three studies, we examine the effect of BII on purchase intention, the mediating roles of authenticity and justice, and the moderating effect of empathy. We show that low and moderate BII elicit higher purchase intention than high BII, and that low BII elicits higher purchase intention than moderate BII. Moreover, authenticity and justice perceptions drive these effects, and both direct and indirect effects of BII on purchasing intention depend on a person’s empathy toward the sociopolitical issue. Collectively, the findings advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the boundary conditions of BII and provide practitioners and change-makers with recommendations for brand activism strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Serwaa Karikari & Michael A. Callow & Xingxing Zu, 2024. "The Three Musketeers? The Roles of Authenticity, Justice, and Empathy in Consumer Responses to Brand-Issue Incongruence," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 403-414.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/731917
    DOI: 10.1086/731917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731917
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731917
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/731917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/731917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.