IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-731912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobilizing for Cash-in-Use: Addressing the Gap in Neoliberalism Caused by Disruptive Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • Pia A. Albinsson
  • Spencer M. Ross

Abstract

This qualitative research examines the everyday experiences of pro-cash activists who resist marketplace practices that force consumers to use platformed money ecosystems (PMEs) thereby eliminating cash-in-use. Activists allege that the increasing use of PMEs threaten consumers’ financial well-being thereby increasing marketplace vulnerability as banks abuse their oligopoly status to perpetuate a power imbalance. Findings indicate that technology disruptions transitions lead to the exclusion of pro-cash consumers who are deemed illegitimate and deviant and therefore undesirable to financial institutions. These consumers find themselves burdened with the responsibility of proving their legitimacy in the marketplace. We contribute to the literature by empirically demonstrating that the consumer responsibilization process violates state and market logics. In response, consumers engage in collective resistance and consumer activism with the aim of upholding the expected logics (i.e., cash-in-use).

Suggested Citation

  • Pia A. Albinsson & Spencer M. Ross, 2024. "Mobilizing for Cash-in-Use: Addressing the Gap in Neoliberalism Caused by Disruptive Innovations," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 452-466.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/731912
    DOI: 10.1086/731912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731912
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/731912
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/731912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/731912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.