IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-729623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Variety in Past Consumption on Openness to Personalized Recommendation Services

Author

Listed:
  • Sonia Seung-Eun Kim
  • Donald R. Lehmann

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) driven personalized recommendation services automate search, creation of a consideration set, and choice for consumers by suggesting products that should match their tastes. Which consumers are most open to trying these services? This article finds that consumers with higher variety in their past consumption are more willing to try personalized recommendation services. These consumers perceive greater abundance in options they can consume in the future, which encourages them to use services that help narrow choices. The effect is replicated in various product categories such as food, fashion, and music. We clarify that the effect is driven by the desire for optimal decisions by identifying decision difficulty as a moderator. For consumers who perceive it inherently difficult to decide what to consume and thus desire to narrow their options, the effect of past variety diminishes; these consumers are generally open to trying personalized recommendation services.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonia Seung-Eun Kim & Donald R. Lehmann, 2024. "The Effect of Variety in Past Consumption on Openness to Personalized Recommendation Services," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(3), pages 295-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/729623
    DOI: 10.1086/729623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729623
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/729623
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/729623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/729623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.