IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-715545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hard Work: Unanticipated Collaboration in Co-creation Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Gry Høngsmark Knudsen
  • Yun Mi Antorini

Abstract

In this article, we ask the question how individuals and the community share the burden of work tasks during prolonged co-creation processes. Building on theories of user community, co-creation, and work, we analyze the LEGO Ideas co-creation platform and the user interactions around co-creation projects. Our analysis contributes to the understandings of work in co-creation processes, and it expands our understanding of consumer fatigue in collaborative communities. We argue that even when the reward is individual, the community’s share in the achievement is important as more than affectual work. This is because the community performs tasks such as promoting and marketing projects and employing digital skills such as video or software renderings. Furthermore, we argue that creating a shared feeling of project value, even when a project is not approved by the company is important for maintaining participation in co-creation communities, because community empathy and care are not sufficient in such cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Gry Høngsmark Knudsen & Yun Mi Antorini, 2021. "Hard Work: Unanticipated Collaboration in Co-creation Processes," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(4), pages 435-446.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/715545
    DOI: 10.1086/715545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715545
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715545
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/715545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grant, Annetta & Weijo, Henri & Dacin, Peter A., 2023. "How institutional logics shape fairness in crowdsourcing: The case of Threadless," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 378-397.
    2. Ifra Aziz Khan Niazi & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi & Shabana Naveed & Mashari Mahmood, 2023. "Analysing the Challenges of Insurance Companies in Pakistan While Co-Creating the Service Value," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(1), pages 113-130, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/715545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.