IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-710248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Promotion (In)frequency and Consumers’ Brand Quality Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Ashok K. Lalwani
  • Jessie J. Wang
  • David H. Silvera

Abstract

Previous research suggests that consumers judge the quality of a brand promoted infrequently less favorably than a brand promoted frequently, because the former promotional pattern tends to be less expected and generates negative attributions. We suggest that the opposite can also occur. Specifically, adaption level theory would suggest that frequent (vs. infrequent) promotions encourage consumers to adapt to a lower reference price for the brand. Because lower reference prices are associated with lower quality perceptions, the infrequently promoted brand’s quality is likely to be judged more positively. We also identify boundary conditions for the effect. Specifically, when price information is difficult to process or when people are anxious about math, infrequent (vs. frequent) price promotions reduce consumers’ brand quality evaluations. Three studies support these hypotheses. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashok K. Lalwani & Jessie J. Wang & David H. Silvera, 2021. "Price Promotion (In)frequency and Consumers’ Brand Quality Evaluations," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(1), pages 91-101.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/710248
    DOI: 10.1086/710248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/710248
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/710248
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/710248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/710248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.