IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-699207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Implicit Self-Theories on Causal Inferences about Superstitions and Consequences on Subsequent Tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Jungyun Kang
  • Ji Kyung Park
  • Hakkyun Kim

Abstract

When people succeed in a challenging task after using a product associated with a good luck superstition cue, will they infer that their superstitious consumption is a key reason for their success? We found that entity theorists (but not incremental theorists) tend to attribute their success to their superstitious consumption (studies 1, 2, and 3). Moreover, we found that such causal inferences create negative consequences on subsequent tasks, which vary depending on whether people can continue to engage in superstitious consumption. Specifically, entity theorists tend to feel a weaker sense of self-efficacy toward a subsequent task if they cannot engage in the same superstitious consumption as in the prior task (study 2). Moreover, if they continue to engage in the same superstitious consumption as in the prior task, entity theorists reduce their effort on the subsequent task (study 3).

Suggested Citation

  • Jungyun Kang & Ji Kyung Park & Hakkyun Kim, 2018. "The Influence of Implicit Self-Theories on Causal Inferences about Superstitions and Consequences on Subsequent Tasks," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(4), pages 477-489.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/699207
    DOI: 10.1086/699207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/699207
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/699207
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/699207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/699207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.