IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsy/journl/journl_tsy_er_2008_2_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative methodologies for projecting defence spending

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Duke

    (Treasury, Government of Australia)

  • Cameron McKean

    (Treasury, Government of Australia)

Abstract

This paper is based on research done for the Intergenerational Report 2007. A brief discussion of alternative methodologies for projecting defence spending was included in the appendix of the report. This paper provides a more detailed discussion of the alternative methodologies explored and shows the projections that were done, updated for current defence spending data. Other longer-term economic projections for Australia are consistent with those used for the Intergenerational Report 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Duke & Cameron McKean, 2008. "Alternative methodologies for projecting defence spending," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 2, pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:tsy:journl:journl_tsy_er_2008_2_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://archive.treasury.gov.au/documents/1396/PDF/01_Defence_spending.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Kirkpatrick, 2004. "Trends in the costs of weapon systems and the consequences," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 259-273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S Y Sohn & Y Kim & B T Kim, 2009. "Cost of ownership model for spare engines purchase for the Korean navy acquisition program," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1674-1682, December.
    2. Adel Ben Youssef & Gueorgui Ianakiev, 2009. "Intégration du marché européen de la Défense et politiques d’offsets : une analyse en termes de coûts de changement et d’externalités technologiques," Post-Print hal-01082243, HAL.
    3. Renaud Bellais, 2013. "Technology and the defense industry: real threats, bad habits, or new (market) opportunities?," Post-Print hal-00947395, HAL.
    4. Saar Golde & Asher Tishler, 2004. "Security Needs, Arms Exports, and the Structure of the Defense Industry," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(5), pages 672-698, October.
    5. Jean Belin & Marianne Guille, 2008. "R&D et innovation en France : quel financement pour les entreprises de la Défense ?," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 33-59.
    6. Renaud Bellais & Daniel Fiott, 2017. "The European defense market: Disruptive innovation and market destabilization," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 38-45, April.
    7. Bongers, Anelí & Torres, José L., 2014. "Measuring technological trends: A comparison between U.S. and U.S.S.R./Russian jet fighter aircraft," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 125-134.
    8. Bongers, Anelí & Torres, José L., 2014. "Technological change in U.S. jet fighter aircraft," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1570-1581.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    defence; military expenditure; national security;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsy:journl:journl_tsy_er_2008_2_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The Treasury (Commonwealth of Australia) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/trgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.