IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v73y1991i1p40-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Fringe Benefits on Employment Fluctuations in U.S. Automobile Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Smyth, David J
  • Karlson, Stephen H

Abstract

The authors present a theoretical and empirical analysis of employment adjustment by U.S. automobile manufacturers. The model allows for variable elasticities of substitution among labor and other inputs and between hours and workers. They use total compensation as their measure of labor cost. The authors' labor effectiveness function has diminishing marginal returns to hours. The speed of employment adjustment depends on the relative costs of straight-time and overtime hours. Copyright 1991 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Smyth, David J & Karlson, Stephen H, 1991. "The Effect of Fringe Benefits on Employment Fluctuations in U.S. Automobile Manufacturing," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 73(1), pages 40-49, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:73:y:1991:i:1:p:40-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0034-6535%28199102%2973%3A1%3C40%3ATEOFBO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoshifumi Nakata & Ryoji Takehiro, 2003. "Total Labor Costs and the Employment Adjustment Behavior of Large Japanese Firms," NBER Chapters, in: Labor Markets and Firm Benefit Policies in Japan and the United States, pages 135-156, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Stuart Glosser & Lonnie Golden, 2005. "Is labour becoming more or less flexible? Changing dynamic behaviour and asymmetries of labour input in US manufacturing," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 29(4), pages 535-557, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:73:y:1991:i:1:p:40-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.