IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpe/jtecpo/2019532175--198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Manufacturers’ Incentive and Government Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Shao
  • Hangjun Yang
  • Anming Zhang

Abstract

In the literature, auto manufacturers’ incentives for adopting electric vehicles and their interactions with government policies are understudied, especially through an analytical approach. We develop a game-theoretic model to investigate what vehicle types should be produced from both private firms’ and social perspectives. We then propose an EV-subsidy/environmental-tax policy and derive the optimal policy parameters that maximise social welfare. The monopoly and duopoly markets are examined and compared, and it is shown that the government should charge a higher environmental tax, while offering a lower EV subsidy, in the duopoly market than in the monopoly market.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Shao & Hangjun Yang & Anming Zhang, 2019. "Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Manufacturers’ Incentive and Government Policy," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 53(2), pages 175-17-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpe:jtecpo:2019:53:2:175--198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26629602
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shang, Wen-Long & Zhang, Junjie & Wang, Kun & Yang, Hangjun & Ochieng, Washington, 2024. "Can financial subsidy increase electric vehicle (EV) penetration---evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 190(PA).
    2. Ma, Kai & Zhao, Lei, 2024. "The impact of new energy transportation means on China's food import," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Shao, Jing & Jiang, Changmin & Cui, Yinglong & Tang, Yao, 2023. "A game-theoretic model to compare charging infrastructure subsidy and electric vehicle subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpe:jtecpo:2019:53:2:175--198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.bath.ac.uk/e-journals/jtep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.