IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v9y2016i3p13-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Customer satisfaction from private utility companies: An explanatory study

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni-Plousia Kosteroglou

    (Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology, Agios Loukas, 65404, Kavala, Greece)

  • Georgios Theriou

    (Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology, Agios Loukas, 65404, Kavala, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Chatzoudes

    (Democritus University of Thrace, 12 Vasilissis Sofias Street, 67100, Xanthi, Greece)

Abstract

Purpose – The present study examines the factors that have an impact on "customer satisfaction" in the context of private utility companies. The main purpose of the study is accomplished through the development and the empirical testing of a conceptual frame-work (research model). The proposed framework includes six dimensions (research factors): (a) tangibles, (b) reliability, (c) responsiveness, (d) assurance, (e) empathy, and (f) customer satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach – The present study adopted the SERVQUAL approach (model), only after analytically testing its suitability for use within the investigated area. In that direction, the focus group methodology was used. Finally, the proposed con-ceptual framework was tested on a random sample of gas consumers residing in the area of Thessaloniki, Greece. The final sample consisted of 437 adult consumers. The reliability and the validity of the questionnaire were thoroughly examined. Empirical data were analysed using the “Structural Equation Modelling” (SEM) technique. The present study is empirical, explanatory, deductive and, mainly, quantitative. Findings – Empirical results indicate that "reliability" has the highest impact on "customer satisfaction", while "empathy" has no impact at all. More specifically, the impact of "reliability" on "customer satisfaction" is indirect, mediated through three other di-mensions of the conceptual framework (namely, "tangibles", "responsiveness" and "empathy"). Research limitations/implications – A limitation stemming from the implemented methodology is the use of self-reported scales for the measurement of the six research factors. Moreover, the paper lacks a longitudinal approach. Finally, the empirical research (survey) is focused on one organisation and, therefore, offers relatively limited generalizability. Originality/value – Very few studies have utilised the SERVQUAL approach in the context of an explanatory research. This approach offers a unique understanding of the relationship that exist between its five dimensions (factors) (tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy). Such an approach has very rarely been attempted in the relevant literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni-Plousia Kosteroglou & Georgios Theriou & Dimitrios Chatzoudes, 2016. "Customer satisfaction from private utility companies: An explanatory study," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 9(3), pages 13-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:13-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijbesar.teiemt.gr/docs/volume9_issue3/customer_satisfaction.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://ijbesar.teiemt.gr/volume9_issue3.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holt, Lynne, 2005. "Utility service quality--Telecommunications, electricity, water," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 189-200, September.
    2. Colin Shaw & John Ivens, 2002. "Building Great Customer Experiences," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-55471-9, December.
    3. Demirci Orel, Fatma & Kara, Ali, 2014. "Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 118-129.
    4. Liang, Dapeng & Ma, Zhenzhong & Qi, Liyun, 2013. "Service quality and customer switching behavior in China's mobile phone service sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1161-1167.
    5. Blut, Markus & Beatty, Sharon E. & Evanschitzky, Heiner & Brock, Christian, 2014. "The Impact of Service Characteristics on the Switching Costs–Customer Loyalty Link," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 275-290.
    6. Mulder, Peter & de Groot, Henri L.F. & Pfeiffer, Birte, 2014. "Dynamics and determinants of energy intensity in the service sector: A cross-country analysis, 1980–2005," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-15.
    7. Blut, Markus & Frennea, Carly M. & Mittal, Vikas & Mothersbaugh, David L., 2015. "How procedural, financial and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior: A meta-analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 226-229.
    8. Amanda Beatson & Ian Lings & Siegfried Gudergan, 2008. "Employee behaviour and relationship quality: impact on customers," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 211-223, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Irina N. Tkachenko & Ivan A. Chechulin, 2024. "Crisis resilience assessment and management of public utility companies," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 131-159, April.
    2. Hsien-Chih Kuo & Pin Luarn & I-Jen Chen, 2017. "Value Co-creation of Xiaomi in China," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 11(1), pages 26-33, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Mazhar & Ahmed, Masood, 2018. "Determinants of students’ loyalty to university: A service-based approach," MPRA Paper 84352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Sunghee Lee & Jinsoo Park, 2021. "How Switching Costs with Process Monitoring and Operational Integration Affect Sustainable Supplier Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Park, Eunil & Kim, Ki Joon & Kwon, Sang Jib, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of consumer loyalty: An examination of ethical standard, satisfaction, and trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 8-13.
    4. Muzammal Ilyas Sindhu & Muhammad Arif, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and loyalty: Intervening influence of customer satisfaction and trust," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1396655-139, January.
    5. Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Khajehzadeh, Saman, 2016. "The antecedents of customer loyalty: A moderated mediation model of customer relationship management quality and brand image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 262-270.
    6. Heiner Evanschitzky & Valentina Stan & Liane Nagengast, 2022. "Strengthening the satisfaction loyalty link: the role of relational switching costs," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 293-310, June.
    7. Kyungyeol (Anthony) Kim & Kevin K. Byon & Heedong Choi, 2020. "A Conceptual Analysis of Switching Costs: Implications for Fitness Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Coelho do Vale, Rita & Verga Matos, Pedro & Caiado, Jorge, 2016. "The impact of private labels on consumer store loyalty: An integrative perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 179-188.
    9. Pearce, Philip L., 2020. "Tourists' perception of time: Directions for design," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Yusra* & Arawati Agus, 2018. "The influence of Perceived Service Quality towards Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Airasia Self Check-in System," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 766-775:2.
    11. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    12. Giao, Ha Nam Khanh, 2018. "Study of the Factors Affecting Customers' Loyalty for Gym Service at K.I.M Center, Vietnam," OSF Preprints 57g8a, Center for Open Science.
    13. Jatinder Singh & Oriol Iglesias & Joan Batista-Foguet, 2012. "Does Having an Ethical Brand Matter? The Influence of Consumer Perceived Ethicality on Trust, Affect and Loyalty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(4), pages 541-549, December.
    14. G. Tomas M. Hult & Forrest V. Morgeson III & Udit Sharma & Claes Fornell, 2022. "Customer satisfaction and international business: A multidisciplinary review and avenues for research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1695-1733, October.
    15. Sonia Singh & Subhra Mondal & Lata Bajpai Singh & Kalyan Kumar Sahoo & Subhankar Das, 2020. "An Empirical Evidence Study of Consumer Perception and Socioeconomic Profiles for Digital Stores in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-30, February.
    16. Muhammad Tanveer & Harsandaldeep Kaur & George Thomas & Haider Mahmood & Mandakini Paruthi & Zhang Yu, 2021. "Mobile Phone Buying Decisions among Young Adults: An Empirical Study of Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Marjeta Marolt & Hans-Dieter Zimmermann & Andreja Pucihar, 2022. "Social Media Use and Business Performance in SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Relational Social Commerce Capability and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Dwayne D. Gremler & Yves Vaerenbergh & Elisabeth C. Brüggen & Kevin P. Gwinner, 2020. "Understanding and managing customer relational benefits in services: a meta-analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 565-583, May.
    19. Wang, Nan & Wan, Jiahao & Ma, Zhenzhong & Zhou, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2023. "How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Marjeta Marolt & Hans-Dieter Zimmermann & Andreja Pucihar, 2020. "Enhancing Marketing Performance Through Enterprise-Initiated Customer Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Customer satisfaction; Utility companies; SERVQUAL; Empirical study; Structural Equation Modelling;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • L80 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - General
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:9:y:2016:i:3:p:13-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.