IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v12y2019i1p7-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Electronic Books by the Readers

Author

Listed:
  • Efstathios Dimitriadis

    (International Hellenic University, Department of Management Science and Technology, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Chatzoudes

    (Democritus University of Thrace, Department of Production and Management Engineering, Greece)

  • Marta Jordan

    (FH Joanneum - University of Applied Sciences, Austria)

  • François Cudel

    (University of Lille 1, France)

  • Evmorfia Bourdouni

    (International Hellenic University, Department of Accounting and Finance, Greece)

  • Antonios Mandilas

    (International Hellenic University, Department of Management Science and Technology, Greece)

  • Miriam Lutz

    (FH Joanneum - University of Applied Sciences, Austria)

  • Raffael Reisl

    (FH Joanneum - University of Applied Sciences, Austria)

  • Pauline Hego

    (University of Lille 1, France)

  • Théo Mailly

    (University of Lille 1, France)

Abstract

Purpose: One of the main questions about the future of print and electronic books is whether the second will replace the first. Although the electronic book was first introduced to the public in 1971, the trend of reading e-books did not gain popularity until the previous decade. The recent introduction of e-book devices has drastically changed the way people access and use the reading content. Therefore, in the present study, the electronic book is examined not only as an innovative technological product, but also as a cultural commodity. More specifically, the present study aims to develop and empirically test a conceptual framework (research model) that sheds fresh light on the factors that affect e-book adoption by the readers. Design/methodology/approach: The examination of the proposed conceptual framework was made with the use of a newly-developed structured questionnaire that was distributed to book readers residing in three EU countries. In particular, the participants of the survey were citizens from Austria, France and Greece. The study includes nine research factors. Some of them are dependent (e.g., "perceived usefulness", "perceived ease of use", "perceived trust"), while the two main dependent factors of this study are "attitude towards use" and "behavioural intention". The empirical data were analysed using the "Structural Equation Modelling" (SEM) technique. Findings: Empirical results revealed that the factors that have the most significant impact on e-book acceptance, both directly and/or indirectly, are three: "compatibility with the preferred way of reading", "ease of use" and "attitude towards use". Also, the results highlighted interesting differences between the three countries of the sample. Research limitations: A limitation stemming from the implemented methodology is the use of self-reported scales in order to measure the constructs of the proposed model. Also, the paper lacks a longitudinal approach, since it provides a static picture of e-book acceptance (first quarter of 2019). Originality/value: It is of great significance that everyone who has a stake in the adoption of e-books by the readers, understands which factors are the most significant. In that way, the publishing houses, the e-reader manufacturers and the software developers, will be able to approach their consumers more effectively. The present study offers guidelines to these organisations, thus enhancing their understanding about the perceptions of their customers. Moreover, the present study is conducted on a European level (sample from three EU countries), something that has never been attempted before in the relevant literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Efstathios Dimitriadis & Dimitrios Chatzoudes & Marta Jordan & François Cudel & Evmorfia Bourdouni & Antonios Mandilas & Miriam Lutz & Raffael Reisl & Pauline Hego & Théo Mailly, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Electronic Books by the Readers," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 12(1), pages 7-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:7-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/docs/volume12_issue1/12_01_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/volume12_issue1.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    3. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    4. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    5. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    6. Kristin Thomas & Evalill Nilsson & Karin Festin & Pontus Henriksson & Mats Lowén & Marie Löf & Margareta Kristenson, 2020. "Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    8. Ficko, Andrej & Boncina, Andrej, 2013. "Probabilistic typology of management decision making in private forest properties," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-43.
    9. Muhammad Shahid Qureshi & Saadat Saeed & Syed Waleed Mehmood Wasti, 2016. "The impact of various entrepreneurial interventions during the business plan competition on the entrepreneur identity aspirations of participants," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Julie Bayle-Cordier & Loïc Berger & Rayan Elatmani & Massimo Tavoni, 2023. "Breath, Love, Walk? The Impact of Mindfulness Interventions on Climate Policy Support and Environmental Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    11. Szu‐Szu Ho & Rosie Stenhouse & Aisha Holloway, 2020. "Understanding HIV‐positive drug users’ experiences of taking highly active antiretroviral treatment: Identity–Values–Conscious engagement model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1561-1575, May.
    12. Alexandre Cabagnols & Ali Maâlej & Pierre Mauchand & Olfa Kammoun, 2022. "The determinants of entrepreneurial intention of scientist PhD students: analytical vs emotional formation of the intention," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 4(4), pages 63-82, December.
    13. Diwanji, Vaibhav S. & Cortese, Juliann, 2020. "Contrasting user generated videos versus brand generated videos in ecommerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    15. Nouman Khurram & Umair Saeed, 2015. "Factors Influencing the Intention of People to Use Islamic Banking: An Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(8), pages 411-418, August.
    16. Agneta Larsson & Mats Westerberg & Lena Karlqvist & Gunvor Gard, 2018. "Teamwork and Safety Climate in Homecare: A Mixed Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    18. Shuleski Darko & Radu Ioan & Anton Cristian Ioan & Crina Veronica Cristea, 2017. "Digital Transformation Approach for Improving Public Services Using Cloud Computing Technology. Case Study Bucharest, Romania," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    19. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    20. Zhengxia He & Shichun Xu & Wenxing Shen & Meiling Wang & Cunfang Li, 2019. "Exploring external and internal pressures on the environmental behavior of paper enterprises in China: A qualitative study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 951-969, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e-books; e-book adoption; (Enhanced) Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); Intention to use; Empirical study; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L63 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Microelectronics; Computers; Communications Equipment
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:7-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.