IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/teg/journl/v8y2012i4p1-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of testing on student achievement: 1910-2010

Author

Listed:
  • Richard P Phelps

Abstract

This presentation summarizes research on the effect of testing on student achievement as found in English-language sources, comprising several hundred studies conducted between 1910 and 2010. Among quantitative studies, mean effect sizes range from a moderate d ˜ 0.55 to a fairly large d ˜ 0.88, depending on the way effects are aggregated or effect sizes are adjusted for study artifacts. Testing with feedback produces the strongest positive effect on achievement. Adding stakes or frequency also strongly and positively affects achievement. Survey studies produce effect sizes above 1.0. Ninety-three percent of qualitative studies analyzed also reported positive effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P Phelps, 2012. "The effect of testing on student achievement: 1910-2010," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 8(4), pages 1-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:8:y:2012:i:4:p:1-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/Amsterdam.ppt
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Resources/Amsterdam.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard P. Phelps, 2015. "The Test: Why our schools are obsessed with standardized testing: but you don't have to be, by Anya Kamenentz [book review]," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7.
    2. Morten K. Thomsen & Julie K. Seerup & Jens Dietrichson & Anja Bondebjerg & Bjørn C. A. Viinholt, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Testing frequency and student achievement: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    3. Carnaghan, Carla & Edmonds, Thomas P. & Lechner, Thomas A. & Olds, Philip R., 2011. "Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 265-283.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; policy;

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:8:y:2012:i:4:p:1-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard P. Phelps (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nonpartisaneducation.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.