IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v38y2022i1p641-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quality of life of seniors from Romania during the coronavirus pandemic period

Author

Listed:
  • Gianina Chirugu

    (Faculty of Theology, Ovidius University of Constanta.)

  • Mihaela Rus

    (Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta.)

Abstract

This paper presents a pilot study conducted at the national level of Romania, which has as main objective the analysis of the quality of life of elderly people during the pandemic period. The sociological survey based on self-administered questionnaire was established as a research method, and for the data collection was developed the working tool adapted to the older people’s quality of life (OPQOL) questionnaire model. In order to have a clear picture of the quality of life of elderly people in Romania during the pandemic period, the following indicators were used in the analysis of the quality of life of elderly people: the status of beneficiary of social services, gender of the elderly, the geographical area in which the elderly person lives, the degree of satisfaction of the quality of life of the elderly, the impact of the pandemic on the lifestyle of the elderly. The participation of elderly people in the study was voluntary and their responses are confidential and are used exclusively for scientific purposes. The questionnaire has three parts, the first being dedicated to a general question, the second part contains 13 closed questions and the last part includes socio-demographic variables regarding the elderly participants in the research are cumulative for the whole sample both for those benefiting from social services, and for those who are not in the records of an institution providing social services. The research involved 306 elderly people aged between 61 and 99 years, the gender of the respondents participating in the research is mostly female, and the living environment is mostly urban and one third of the elderly people participating in the pilot study live alone. The two hypotheses from which quantitative research was based have been confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianina Chirugu & Mihaela Rus, 2022. "The quality of life of seniors from Romania during the coronavirus pandemic period," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 38(1), pages 641-648, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:641-648
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7870/2895
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7870
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Valentina Hlebec & Tatjana Rakar, 2020. "Sustainable Care in a Familialist Regime: Coping with Elderly Care in Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Yang Zhou & Quan Yuan & Chao Yang, 2020. "Transport for the Elderly: Activity Patterns, Mode Choices, and Spatiotemporal Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihaela Ghența & Aniela Matei & Luise Mladen-Macovei & Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Elen-Silvana Bobârnat, 2021. "Sustainable Care and Factors Associated with Quality of Life among Older Beneficiaries of Social Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Sara Santini & Barbara D’Amen & Marco Socci & Mirko Di Rosa & Elizabeth Hanson & Valentina Hlebec, 2022. "Difficulties and Needs of Adolescent Young Caregivers of Grandparents in Italy and Slovenia: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Kaniz Fatima & Sara Moridpour & Tayebeh Saghapour, 2022. "Measuring Neighbourhood Walking Access for Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Xinghua Liu & Qian Ye & Ye Li & Jing Fan & Yue Tao, 2021. "Examining Public Concerns and Attitudes toward Unfair Events Involving Elderly Travelers during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Weibo Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Kaniz Fatima & Sara Moridpour & Tayebeh Saghapour, 2021. "Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Elderly Public Transport Mode Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Tim Arlinghaus & Kevin Kus & Patricia Kajüter Rodrigues & Frank Teuteberg, 2023. "Visualizing Benefits of Case Management Software Using Utility Effect Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Mariana Calderón-Jaramillo & Pilar Zueras, 2023. "Cared and uncared populations: understanding unmet care needs of older adults (65+) across different social care systems in Europe," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Joanna Miklinska, 2023. "Selected Urban Mobility Issues of the Elderly:The Polish Experience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 904-920.
    9. Zhou, Yang & Yuan, Quan & Ding, Fangyi & Chen, Mingyang & Yang, Chao & Guo, Tangyi, 2022. "Demand, mobility, and constraints: Exploring travel behaviors and mode choices of older adults using a facility-based framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Elderly people; quality of life; pandemic; social services; questionnaire;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:38:y:2022:i:1:p:641-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.