IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v42y2010i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Throughput optimization in dual-gripper interval robotic cells

Author

Listed:
  • Milind Dawande
  • H. Geismar
  • Michael Pinedo
  • Chelliah Sriskandarajah

Abstract

Interval robotic cells with several processing stages (chambers) have been increasingly used for diverse wafer fabrication processes in semiconductor manufacturing. Processes such as low-pressure chemical vapor deposition, etching, cleaning and chemical-mechanical planarization, require strict time control for each processing stage. A wafer treated in a processing chamber must leave that chamber within a specified time limit; otherwise the wafer is exposed to residual gases and heat, resulting in quality problems. Interval robotic cells are also widely used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards.The problem of scheduling operations in dual-gripper interval robotic cells that produce identical wafers (or parts) is considered in this paper. The objective is to find a 1-unit cyclic sequence of robot moves that minimizes the long-run average time to produce a part or, equivalently, maximizes the throughput. Initially two extreme cases are considered, namely no-wait cells and free-pickup cells; for no-wait cells (resp., free-pickup cells), an optimal (resp., asymptotically optimal) solution is obtained in polynomial time. It is then proved that the problem is strongly NP-hard for a general interval cell. Finally, results of an extensive computational study aimed at analyzing the improvement in throughput realized by using a dual-gripper robot instead of a single-gripper robot are presented. It is shown that employing a dual-gripper robot can lead to a significant gain in productivity. Operations managers can compare the resulting increase in revenue with the additional costs of acquiring and maintaining a dual-gripper robot to determine the circumstances under which such an investment is appropriate.[Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions for the following supplemental resources: Proofs of all theoretical results, a table summarizing these results, a summary of Algorithm FindCycle, and the Levner–Kats–Levit Algorithm.]

Suggested Citation

  • Milind Dawande & H. Geismar & Michael Pinedo & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2010. "Throughput optimization in dual-gripper interval robotic cells," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:42:y:2010:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.1080/07408170902789092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07408170902789092
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07408170902789092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drobouchevitch, Inna G. & Neil Geismar, H. & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2010. "Throughput optimization in robotic cells with input and output machine buffers: A comparative study of two key models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 623-633, November.
    2. Tharanga Rajapakshe & Milind Dawande & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2011. "Quantifying the Impact of Layout on Productivity: An Analysis from Robotic-Cell Manufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 440-454, April.
    3. Xin Li & Richard Y. K. Fung, 2016. "Optimal K-unit cycle scheduling of two-cluster tools with residency constraints and general robot moving times," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 165-176, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:42:y:2010:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.