IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v77y2006i6p1058-1080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty and College Student Beliefs about the Frequency of Student Academic Misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen F. Hard
  • James M. Conway
  • Antonia C. Moran

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen F. Hard & James M. Conway & Antonia C. Moran, 2006. "Faculty and College Student Beliefs about the Frequency of Student Academic Misconduct," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(6), pages 1058-1080, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:77:y:2006:i:6:p:1058-1080
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2006.11778956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778956
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2006.11778956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Winrow, Brian, 2016. "Do perceptions of the utility of ethics affect academic cheating?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Bujaki, Merridee & Lento, Camillo & Sayed, Naqi, 2019. "Utilizing professional accounting concepts to understand and respond to academic dishonesty in accounting programs," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 28-47.
    3. Levon R. Hayrapetyan, 2011. "Prevention And Detection Of Certain Types Of Plagiarism During Computerized Assessments," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 3(1), pages 113-120.
    4. Joan Lynch & Bronwyn Everett & Lucie M Ramjan & Renee Callins & Paul Glew & Yenna Salamonson, 2017. "Plagiarism in nursing education: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2845-2864, October.
    5. Šprajc Polona & Urh Marko & Jerebic Janja & Trivan Dragan & Jereb Eva, 2017. "Reasons for Plagiarism in Higher Education," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(1), pages 33-45, February.
    6. Sandra Scott, 2017. "From Plagiarism‐Plagued to Plagiarism‐Proof: Using Anonymized Case Assignments in Intermediate Accounting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 247-268, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:77:y:2006:i:6:p:1058-1080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.