IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v76y2020i2p26-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Sentiment and the Price of Corporate Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • George Serafeim

Abstract

Combining environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data with “big data” measuring public sentiment about corporate sustainability performance, I found that the valuation premium for strong sustainability performance increases as a function of positive momentum in public sentiment. An ESG factor long (short) on companies with superior (inferior) sustainability performance and negative (positive) ESG sentiment momentum delivered significant positive alpha. In contrast, the high-sentiment ESG factor delivered insignificant alpha and was negatively correlated with the value factor. The evidence suggests that public sentiment influences investor views about the value of sustainability activities and that big ESG data can be useful in identifying “value” ESG stocks.Disclosure: The author is an academic partner at State Street Associates conducting research on ESG issues and sits on the advisory board of investment organizations that use ESG data. Editor’s Note: Submitted 29 Sep 2019accepted 23 Jan 2020 by Stephen J. Brown.

Suggested Citation

  • George Serafeim, 2020. "Public Sentiment and the Price of Corporate Sustainability," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 26-46, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:26-46
    DOI: 10.1080/0015198X.2020.1723390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1723390
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1723390?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:76:y:2020:i:2:p:26-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.