IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v61y2005i1p15-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mutual Fund Industry 60 Years Later: For Better or Worse?

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Bogle

Abstract

The mutual fund industry has undergone tremendous change in the past 60 years. Total assets, number of funds, and fund costs have increased exponentially, whereas both the duration of the funds' portfolio holdings and the duration of their shareholders' holdings have tumbled. The industry's ownership of corporate stocks is at an all-time high, yet mutual fund managers have been noticeably absent from the corporate governance debate. This article details 10 fundamental changes that have taken place in the mutual fund industry since 1945 and finds that, in the aggregate, they have benefited mutual fund managers to the direct and commensurate detriment of mutual fund investors. The mutual fund industry has undergone tremendous change since 1945. Among the 10 major changes I identify and discuss are the following:The size and the number of funds available: What was a small industry (68, largely stock-oriented funds) with less than $1 billion in assets has become a giant, with assets now spread over a $7 trillion array of 8,000 stock, bond, and money market funds.Broadening of stock fund investment styles: Stock funds in 1945 were largely large-capitalization blend funds that offered broad diversification, and for the most part, they were suitable to be held as the sole component of an investor’s equity investment portfolio. Today, “style box” investing has become the name of the game. Investors are able to slice and dice their equity fund investments into any number of styles and sectors.Fund holding periods have declined dramatically: From the 1940s until the mid-1960s, equity mutual funds were long-term investors that turned their portfolios over at an annual rate of less than 20 percent. They have gradually become short-term speculators that now turn their portfolios over at an annual rate of more than 100 percent.The mutual fund industry’s ownership of Corporate America: In 1945, the mutual fund industry controlled barely more than 1 percent of all U.S. equities. Today, that figure is nearly 25 percent. The mutual fund industry has become the proverbial 800-pound gorilla. It could sit anywhere it wants at the corporate board table, but it rarely even attends the meetings.The costs of fund ownership have risen dramatically: Total mutual fund assets have increased 3,600-fold since 1945, but mutual fund fees and operating expenses have increased 6,600-fold in that same period—a stunning rise, particularly in an industry that is characterized by tremendous economies of scale.These changes in the industry raise a simple question: Have the changes benefited mutual fund investors? Extensive data confirm that they have not. The industry needs to go “back to the future” and return to its fiduciary roots.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Bogle, 2005. "The Mutual Fund Industry 60 Years Later: For Better or Worse?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(1), pages 15-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:61:y:2005:i:1:p:15-24
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v61.n1.2678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v61.n1.2678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v61.n1.2678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:61:y:2005:i:1:p:15-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.