IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ufajxx/v54y1998i6p35-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why So Much Error in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts?

Author

Listed:
  • Vijay Kumar Chopra

Abstract

Wall Street analysts tend to be too optimistic about the earnings prospects of companies they follow. The average consensus 12-month EPS growth forecast is 17.7 percent, which is more than twice the actual growth rate. In aggregate, forecasts are 11.2 percent above actual earnings at the start of a year and are revised downward continuously in the course of the year. For the full study period reported here, the percentage of 12-month earnings estimates revised downward exceeded the percentage revised upward, on average, by 4.4 percent every month. Since 1993, however, the quality of analyst forecasts seems to have improved. This article provides an intuitive explanation of the change and suggests ways in which analysts can use the explanation to improve portfolio performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijay Kumar Chopra, 1998. "Why So Much Error in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts?," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 35-42, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:54:y:1998:i:6:p:35-42
    DOI: 10.2469/faj.v54.n6.2223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2469/faj.v54.n6.2223
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2469/faj.v54.n6.2223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qazi Ghulam Mustafa Qureshi & Yves Mard & Francois Aubert, 2024. "Do analysts predict managed or unmanaged earnings?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(2), pages 527-545, June.
    2. Chen Su & Hanxiong Zhang & Robert S. Hudson, 2020. "The time‐varying performance of UK analyst recommendation revisions: Do market conditions matter?," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 65-89, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ufajxx:v:54:y:1998:i:6:p:35-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ufaj20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.